1, 8, 27, 64, 125 are the only cubes under 180. 1 is the only factor.
Perfect cubes smaller than 135 are 1, 8, 27, 64, and 125. Of these, 1 and 27 are factors of 135, so 27 is the largest factor of 135 that is a perfect cube.
81 is a perfect squarebecause 81 = 9*9. It is NOT a perfect cube.
No, it's a perfect cube.
Look at the factors of 180. 180 = 18 * 100 So √180 = √18 * √100 Now look at the factors of each of those and look for perfect squares. => √(9 * 2) * √10 => √9 * √23 * 10 => 3 * √2 * √10 => 3 * √20 => properly written it would just be 3√20
1 (1x1x1 or 1x1)
56 2,2,2,7 perfect cubes=1,8
No, 2700 is not a perfect cube. A perfect cube is a number that can be expressed as the cube of an integer. The prime factorization of 2700 is (2^2 \times 3^3 \times 5^2), and since not all prime factors have exponents that are multiples of three, it cannot be a perfect cube.
The cube root of 180 is 5.646216173
no it is not 4 is a perfect cube
If by cube you mean perfect cube (a cube of an integer), then no, and the nearest perfect cube is 81.
To find the largest perfect cube factor of 189, we first need to factor it into its prime components. The prime factorization of 189 is (3^3 \times 7^1). The largest perfect cube that can be formed from these factors is (3^3), which equals 27. Therefore, the largest perfect cube factor of 189 is 27.
No, 148 is not a perfect cube.
Perfect cubes smaller than 135 are 1, 8, 27, 64, and 125. Of these, 1 and 27 are factors of 135, so 27 is the largest factor of 135 that is a perfect cube.
No, 2 is neither a perfect square nor a perfect cube.
Yes, 1 is considered a perfect cube because it can be expressed as (1^3), which equals 1. A perfect cube is defined as a number that can be written as the cube of an integer, and since 1 is the cube of the integer 1, it qualifies as a perfect cube.
Because they are square/cube of an integer.
It is both because 1,000,000 is a perfect cube and a perfect square number