Perfect cubes smaller than 135 are 1, 8, 27, 64, and 125. Of these, 1 and 27 are factors of 135, so 27 is the largest factor of 135 that is a perfect cube.
81 is a perfect squarebecause 81 = 9*9. It is NOT a perfect cube.
No, it's a perfect cube.
Look at the factors of 180. 180 = 18 * 100 So √180 = √18 * √100 Now look at the factors of each of those and look for perfect squares. => √(9 * 2) * √10 => √9 * √23 * 10 => 3 * √2 * √10 => 3 * √20 => properly written it would just be 3√20
1 (1x1x1 or 1x1)
Sure, honey, let me break it down for you. No, a prime number cannot be a perfect cube because a prime number is only divisible by 1 and itself. And let me tell you, a perfect cube is the result of multiplying a number by itself three times, so a prime number ain't gonna fit that bill. So, in short, a prime number and a perfect cube are like oil and water - they just don't mix, darling.
56 2,2,2,7 perfect cubes=1,8
The cube root of 180 is 5.646216173
no it is not 4 is a perfect cube
Perfect cubes smaller than 135 are 1, 8, 27, 64, and 125. Of these, 1 and 27 are factors of 135, so 27 is the largest factor of 135 that is a perfect cube.
If by cube you mean perfect cube (a cube of an integer), then no, and the nearest perfect cube is 81.
No, 148 is not a perfect cube.
No, 2 is neither a perfect square nor a perfect cube.
Because they are square/cube of an integer.
It is both because 1,000,000 is a perfect cube and a perfect square number
A cube root of a perfect cube has only one dimension. A perfect cube is a number that can be obtained by multiplying an integer by itself three times. Taking the cube root of a perfect cube will give you the original integer value, effectively reducing the dimensionality back to one.
Not a perfect cube.