56
2,2,2,7
perfect cubes=1,8
For a number to be a perfect square and a perfect cube, it must be a perfect sixth power. Now 36 = 729 is too small and 56 = 15625 is too large, leaving 46 = 4096 as the answer.
The cube root of -56 = -3.825862
If by cube you mean perfect cube (a cube of an integer), then no, and the nearest perfect cube is 81.
It is a perfect cube.
It is not a perfect cube.
2744
The question could ask for the perfect cube of 56, which equals 563 = 175616. However, it can also mean to ask whether 56 can be a cube, which could be answered by 56(1/3), which cubed is 56. Since 56(1/3) is an irrational number, it is impossible to construct this perfectly, but one can make arbitrary precise approximations, close to 3.825862365...
For a number to be a perfect square and a perfect cube, it must be a perfect sixth power. Now 36 = 729 is too small and 56 = 15625 is too large, leaving 46 = 4096 as the answer.
The cube root of -56 = -3.825862
no it is not 4 is a perfect cube
If by cube you mean perfect cube (a cube of an integer), then no, and the nearest perfect cube is 81.
To find the largest perfect cube factor of 189, we first need to factor it into its prime components. The prime factorization of 189 is (3^3 \times 7^1). The largest perfect cube that can be formed from these factors is (3^3), which equals 27. Therefore, the largest perfect cube factor of 189 is 27.
No, 148 is not a perfect cube.
Perfect cubes smaller than 135 are 1, 8, 27, 64, and 125. Of these, 1 and 27 are factors of 135, so 27 is the largest factor of 135 that is a perfect cube.
No, 2 is neither a perfect square nor a perfect cube.
Because they are square/cube of an integer.
It is both because 1,000,000 is a perfect cube and a perfect square number