answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

1+q

User Avatar

Wiki User

7y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Cory Curle

Lvl 2
4y ago

24

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Anonymous

Lvl 1
4y ago

1+q

This answer is:
User Avatar
User Avatar

Holmes Taymeir

Lvl 1
4y ago
1+q

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: The sum of 1 and q?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Algebra

What is 4 times the sum of q and p?

4(p + q), or 4p + 4q


When the factors of a trinomial are x p and x q then the constant term of the trinomial is?

The sum of -p and -q -


When the factors of a trinomial are (x p) and (x q) then the coefficient of the x-term in the trinomial is?

The sum of p and q


Write the algabraic expression for 4 times the sum of q and p?

4(QxP)


Is not p and q equivalent to not p and not q?

Think of 'not' as being an inverse. Not 1 = 0. Not 0 = 1. Using boolean algebra we can look at your question. 'and' is a test. It wants to know if BOTH P and Q are the same and if they are 1 (true). If they are not the same, or they are both 0, then the result is false or 0. not P and Q is rewritten like so: (P and Q)' = X not P and not Q is rewritten like: P' and Q' = X (the apostrophe is used for not) We will construct a truth table for each and compare the output. If the output is the same, then you have found your equivalency. Otherwise, they are not equivalent. P and Q are the inputs and X is the output. P Q | X P Q | X ------ 0 0 | 1 0 0 | 1 0 1 | 1 0 1 | 0 1 0 | 1 1 0 | 0 1 1 | 0 1 1 | 0 Since the truth tables are not equal, not P and Q is not equivalent to not P and not Q. Perhaps you meant "Is NOT(P AND Q) equivalent to NOT(P) AND NOT(Q)?" NOT(P AND Q) can be thought of intuitively as "Not both P and Q." Which if you think about, you can see that it would be true if something were P but not Q, Q but not P, and neither P nor Q-- so long as they're not both true at the same time. Now, "NOT(P) AND NOT(Q)" is clearly _only_ true when BOTH P and Q are false. So there are cases where NOT(P AND Q) is true but NOT(P) AND NOT(Q) is false (an example would be True(P) and False(Q)). NOT(P AND Q) does have an equivalence however, according to De Morgan's Law. The NOT can be distributed, but in doing so we have to change the "AND" to an "OR". NOT(P AND Q) is equivalent to NOT(P) OR NOT(Q)