0
What else would need to be congruent to show that triangle ABC equals triangle XYZ by aas?
What else can I help you with?
What else would need to be congruent to show that triangle abc is congruent to xyz by SAS?
"What else" implies there is already something that is congruent. But since you have not bothered to share that crucial bit of information, I cannot provide a more useful answer.
Is LMN OPQ If so name the congruence postulate that applies?
congruent - SSSAnswer by Arteom, Friday December 10, 2010
What else would need to be congruent to show that abc congruent xyz by SAS?
__ - __ AC = XZ = is the similar sign
What else would need to be congruent to show that abc def by asa?
Angle "A" is congruent to Angle "D"
What else would need to be congruent to show abc is congruent to def by AAS?
"What else" implies there is already something that is congruent. But since you have not bothered to share that crucial bit of information, I cannot provide a more useful answer.
What else would need to be congruent to show that triangle abc equals xyz by sas?
bh=ws
What else would you to need to show triangle efg congruent to triangle hij by sss?
D). Eg = hj
What else would need to be congruent to show that triangle ABC is congruent to triangle XYZ by Angle Side Angle?
Without seeing the picture, I can't tell what's already known to be congruent, so there's no way I can figure out what 'else' is needed.
What else would be need to be congruent to show that triangle JKL congruent MNO by AAS?
To show that triangle JKL is congruent to triangle MNO by the Angle-Angle-Side (AAS) theorem, you need to establish that two angles and the non-included side of triangle JKL are congruent to two angles and the corresponding non-included side of triangle MNO. Specifically, you would need to verify that one of the angles in triangle JKL is congruent to one of the angles in triangle MNO, and that the side opposite the angle in triangle JKL is congruent to the corresponding side in triangle MNO. This would complete the necessary conditions for AAS congruence.
What else would need to be congruent to show that triangle abc is congruent to xyz by SAS?
"What else" implies there is already something that is congruent. But since you have not bothered to share that crucial bit of information, I cannot provide a more useful answer.
What else would need to congruent to show that abc equals pqr by sss?
That depends on which sides have not been proven congruent yet.
Is an isosceles triangle always never or sometimes congruent?
"Congruent" means "same shape and size as the other one". So one thing all by itself is never congruent. It needs something else to be congruent with. An isosceles triangle is never congruent to a scalene triangle, sometimes congruent to any other kind of triangle, and always congruent to another isosceles triangle that's congruent to the first one.
What else would need to be congruent to show that triangle abc congruent to xyz by asa?
To show that triangle ABC is congruent to triangle XYZ by the ASA (Angle-Side-Angle) criterion, we need to establish that two angles in triangle ABC are congruent to two angles in triangle XYZ, along with the side that is included between those angles being congruent. Specifically, if we have ∠A ≅ ∠X, ∠B ≅ ∠Y, and side AB ≅ XY, then the triangles can be concluded as congruent by ASA. Thus, we would need to confirm the congruence of these angles and the included side.
Why is a triangle and a square congruent?
congruent means that all the sides are the same length. the sides of a square have to be the same length or else it would be a rectangle. Not all triangles are congruent though. there are other types of triangles unlike the square, where there is only one type.
What is a type of triangle with no congruent sides or angles?
it is impossible* * * * * Although it is impossible to have a triangle with no sides or angles congruent to anything else in the 2-d world, I suggest that the answer to this question is a scalene triangle.
What else would need to be congruent to show that jkl mno by aas?
AAS is equal to angle-angle-side, and is descriptive of a triangle. JKL and MNO would be the sides and angles of a triangle. The two sides must be congruent to the opposite angle.
What else would need to be congruent to show that abc is congruent to def by the aas theorem?
To show that triangles ABC and DEF are congruent by the AAS (Angle-Angle-Side) theorem, you need to establish that two angles and the non-included side of one triangle are congruent to the corresponding two angles and the non-included side of the other triangle. If you have already shown two angles congruent, you would need to prove that one of the sides opposite one of those angles in triangle ABC is congruent to the corresponding side in triangle DEF. This additional information will complete the criteria for applying the AAS theorem.
