Let's try it out: 152 + 362 = 392 225 + 1296 = 1521 1521 = 1521 That is a pythagorean triple.
If the lengths of the sides of the triangle can be substituted for 'a', 'b', and 'c'in the equationa2 + b2 = c2and maintain the equality, then the lengths of the sides are a Pythagorean triple, and the triangle is a right one.
This is the simplest Pythagorean Triple (52 = 32 + 42) so it's a right(-angled) triangle
3,4,5 1,2,3 these are sets of pythagorean triples
'Pythagorean' is the 'adjective for 'Pythagoras'. {ythagoras was a Classical Greek mathematician who gave us the equation h^2 = a^(2) + b^(2) . In words, 'The square of the hypotenuse(h) is equal to the sum of the other two sides squared'. NB This only applies to 'right-angled' triangles (trigons).
There are infinitely many Pythagorean triples. To find a Pythagorean triple take two positive integers x, y with x > y. A Pythagorean triple is of the form x2 - y2, 2xy, x2 + y2.
The integers 3 and 4 form part of the 3-4-5 Pythagorean triple.
nope.
yes.
No because they do not form a Pythagorean triple.
No, the multiple of any random triple is not a Pythagorean triple.
Nearly but not quite a Pythagorean triple
If you mean 3, 4 and 5 then yes it is a Pythagorean triple
The Pythagorean thereom is a^2+b^2=c^2. So, you can tell if they are a Pythagorean triple by seeing if the two smaller numbers squared equal the largest number squared. Example. Are 3,4, and 5 a Pythagorean triple? 3^2= 9. 4^2= 16. 5^2= 25. 9+16=25, so they are a triple.
6, 8, and 10 is simply a scaled up version of a 3,4,5 triangle (simply double each side). Since 3,4,5 is a Pythagorean triple, so is the scaled up triangle. Alternatively, since 6, 8, and 10 are integers (whole numbers) that fulfill the Pythagorean theorem (62 + 82 = 102 ), they are a Pythagorean triple.
What is the value of x if (13, 84, x) is a Pythagorean triple?
A "Pythagorean triple" is a set of 3 numbers that fits the Pythagorean Theorem.So your question is: "Do 2, 6, and 8 form a Pythagorean triple ?", and the answeris either 'yes' or 'no'.(2)2 = 4(6)2 = 364 + 36 = 40(8)2 = 6440 is not equal to 64.So the answer is "no".