The sign is "greater than or equal to" or ≥
When you divide both sides of an inequality by a negative number, the inequality sign flips.
With the equal sign (=).
When solving an inequality, you must revers the inequality sign when you multiply (or divide) both sides by a negative number.
No, you only flip the inequality sign if you are dividing by a negative number on both sides of the inequality
Basically. If the inequality's sign is < or ≤, then you shade the part under the line. If the inequality's sign is > or ≥, then you shade the part over the line.
The symbol is <.
I think you mean no less than which means the same as greater than which is >
When you divide both sides of an inequality by a negative number, the inequality sign flips.
"x281" is an expression, not an inequality. An inequality is supposed to have an inequality sign, such as "<" or ">".
There is no inequality since there is no inequality sign.
With the equal sign (=).
Yes, when the inequality has a less that or equal to sign, or a greater than sign or equal to sign, then the equal sign can be replaced and get a solution that is common to both the equation and the inequality. There can also be other solutions to the inequality, where as the solution for the equation will be a valid one.
When solving an inequality, you must revers the inequality sign when you multiply (or divide) both sides by a negative number.
No, you only flip the inequality sign if you are dividing by a negative number on both sides of the inequality
inequality sign
No, inequalities have more than, less then, at least, or no more than signs. Equations just have equal signs. An inequality answer can't be written as just a number it has to have a sign with it.
This is not an inequality. There is no <,>, or = sign.