45
10OR 01 (if you count zero)
27
6.
2520
An integer is a whole number. So zero could be the smallest integer.
1 is the smallest positive integer. But if you include negative integers, there is no smallest.
The number zero is not the smallest positive integer. The number one is the smallest positive integer.
The smallest positive integer is 1. The largest negative integer is -1. 1 > -1
257 is the smallest integer that can be obtained by rearranging the digits. Of course, -5^72 = -2.12*10^50 is a very negative number and so is very, very small.
The integer is 26
No.
The smallest integer would be -6
The smallest positive integer is 1. 1 is the multiplicative identity; ie anything times 1 is itself. The greatest negative integer is the most positive negative integer which is -1. Therefore the product of the greatest negative integer and the smallest positive integer is the greatest negative integer which is -1.
No, there is not. Suppose k lay claim to be the smallest integer. Then k-1 is and integer and it is smaller than k. So k cannot be the smallest.
The positive integers are {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ...}. The smallest one is 1.
1