There are lots of sets of numbers that fit that definition! But the important thing to remember about triangles is the Third Side Rule, or the Triangle Inequality, which states: the length of a side of a triangle is less than the sum of the lengths of the other two sides and greater than the difference of the lengths of the other two sides. So you can have a triangle with sides of 3, 4 and 5 because 3 < 4 + 5, 4 < 3 + 5 and 5 < 3 + 4; and because 3 > 5 - 4, 4 > 5 - 3 and 5 > 4 - 3. But you can't have a triangle with sides 1, 2 and 8, for example. Just imagine three pieces of wood or three straws with lengths 1, 2 and 8. Put the longest piece, 8, horizontally on the table. Then put the other two, one at each end of the longest piece. Could those two shorter sides ever meet to form a triangle? No, never!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The length is always positive, so that all real positive numbers can represent the length of sides of a triangle: {x| x > 0}.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Whoever added that to my answer, sorry, I beg to differ! The question asked what SET of numbers cannot represent the lengths of the sides of a triangle. There are infinite possibilities for that. While the lengths are always a set of real positive numbers, not every possible set of real positive numbers is a potential set of numbers that represent the lengths of the sides of a triangle!
In a right triangle, the side lengths follow Pythagora's Theorem: a^2 + b^2 = c^2; where a and b represent the lengths of the legs and c represents the hypotenuse.
-- Make sure you have the lengths of all three sides -- Add up the lengths of all three sides to get the perimeter of the triangle.
Scalene Triangle
3 sides of different lengths
A triangle in which no sides are the same lengthA scalene triangle is a triangle in whichall three sides have different lengths.
They are Pythagorean triples
7cm
-- Each number has to be (more than the difference of the other two) but (less than their sum). -- Count the lengths of the sides. If you get to three and then run out of numbers, it's a triangle.
The list that accompanies the question doesn't contain any numbers that could be the lengths of the sides of a triangle.
A scalene triangle has 3 sides of different lengths An isosceles triangle has 2 sides of equal lengths An equilateral triangle has 3 sides of equal lengths
9, 4, and 11 are three dimensionless numbers. Yes, they can represent the lengths of the sides of a triangle. You can take three straight sticks, cut them to lengths of 9, 4, and 11 inches, then lay them down on a table so that the ends hook up and they form a triangle.
The 3 sides have different lengths
All three sides have different lengths.
An isosceles triangle has 3 sides 2 of which are equal in lengths An equilateral triangle has 3 sides all of which are equal in lengths
They are Pythagorean triples
No. In order to be the sides of a right triangle, the square of one of the numbers must be the sum of the squares of the other two numbers. (the square of 9) + (the square of 10) = 181 but (the square of 15) = 225 .
A square's sides have equal lengths, and an equilateral triangle's sides also have equal lengths.