0
Best Answer
No, they are not.
Wiki User
∙ 8y agoThis answer is:
Add your answer:
Earn +20 ptsQ: Are 318 and 1443 relatively prime?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
Continue Learning about Basic Math
Is 70 and 195 relatively prime?
No, they are not relatively prime.
Are 52 and 143 relatively prime?
No, they are not relatively prime.
Is 92 and 274 relatively prime?
No, they are not relatively prime.
Are 42 and 66 relatively prime?
No, they are not relatively prime.
Are 20 and 76 relatively prime?
No, they are not relatively prime.
Related questions
Is 1443 a composite number?
Yes, 1443 is a composite number. Its prime factorisation is 3 x 13 x 37.
Is 1443 a prime number?
No because it has more than two factors
Is 318 prime?
No.
Are 27 and 117 relatively prime?
No, they are not relatively prime.
Is 34 relatively prime?
It can be. 34 is relatively prime to 35. 34 is not relatively prime to 40.
Is 25 a relatively prime?
25 is relatively prime with 36. 25 is not relatively prime with 35.
Is 26 relatively prime?
It can be. 26 is relatively prime to 27. 26 is not relatively prime to 34.
Is 70 and 195 relatively prime?
No, they are not relatively prime.
Are 52 and 143 relatively prime?
No, they are not relatively prime.
Is 92 and 274 relatively prime?
No, they are not relatively prime.
Are 101 and 505 relatively prime?
No, they are not relatively prime.
Is 32 and 76 relatively prime?
No, they are not relatively prime.
Copyright ©2024 Infospace Holdings LLC, A System1 Company. All Rights Reserved. The material on this site can not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with prior written permission of Answers.