No.
No. They both contain the factor 2. 68 = 2 x 2 x 17 118 = 2 x 59 Their LCM is 4012, not 68 x 118 = 8024
The prime factors of 68 are 2 and 17.
68 is not prime. 68 = 2 * 2 * 17
118 is a composite number because it has factors other than 1 and itself. It is not a prime number.The 4 factors of 118 are 1, 2, 59, and 118.The factor pairs of 118 are 1 x 118 and 2 x 59.The proper factors of 118 are 1, 2, and 59 or,if the definition you are using excludes 1, they are 2 and 59.The prime factors of 118 are 2 and 59.The distinct prime factors of 118 are, since there is no repetition of prime factors, also 2 and 59.The prime factorization of 118 is 2 x 59.A factor = any number which can be divided into the given number with no remainder.1 and. 118
No, they are not relatively prime.
NO. Because they have 2 as their common factor aside from 1.
No. They both contain the factor 2. 68 = 2 x 2 x 17 118 = 2 x 59 Their LCM is 4012, not 68 x 118 = 8024
No.
17 and 68 are not relatively prime because they have 17 as a common factor.
No
68 percent of 118 is 80.24.
No. 1 is not their only common factor. 17 is actually a factor of 68, so they have 1 and 17 as common factors.
The prime factors of 68 are 2 and 17.
No, they are not relatively prime.
68 is not prime. 68 = 2 * 2 * 17
It can be. 26 is relatively prime to 27. 26 is not relatively prime to 34.
It can be. 34 is relatively prime to 35. 34 is not relatively prime to 40.