No. They both contain the factor 2. 68 = 2 x 2 x 17 118 = 2 x 59 Their LCM is 4012, not 68 x 118 = 8024
The prime factors of 68 are 2 and 17.
68 is not prime. 68 = 2 * 2 * 17
118 is a composite number because it has factors other than 1 and itself. It is not a prime number.The 4 factors of 118 are 1, 2, 59, and 118.The factor pairs of 118 are 1 x 118 and 2 x 59.The proper factors of 118 are 1, 2, and 59 or,if the definition you are using excludes 1, they are 2 and 59.The prime factors of 118 are 2 and 59.The distinct prime factors of 118 are, since there is no repetition of prime factors, also 2 and 59.The prime factorization of 118 is 2 x 59.A factor = any number which can be divided into the given number with no remainder.1 and. 118
No, they are not relatively prime.
NO. Because they have 2 as their common factor aside from 1.
No. They both contain the factor 2. 68 = 2 x 2 x 17 118 = 2 x 59 Their LCM is 4012, not 68 x 118 = 8024
No.
17 and 68 are not relatively prime because they have 17 as a common factor.
No
68 percent of 118 is 80.24.
No. 1 is not their only common factor. 17 is actually a factor of 68, so they have 1 and 17 as common factors.
The prime factors of 68 are 2 and 17.
68 is not prime. 68 = 2 * 2 * 17
No, 42 and 68 are not relatively prime. They have more than the number 1 as a common factor.
No, they are not relatively prime.
118 is a composite number because it has factors other than 1 and itself. It is not a prime number.The 4 factors of 118 are 1, 2, 59, and 118.The factor pairs of 118 are 1 x 118 and 2 x 59.The proper factors of 118 are 1, 2, and 59 or,if the definition you are using excludes 1, they are 2 and 59.The prime factors of 118 are 2 and 59.The distinct prime factors of 118 are, since there is no repetition of prime factors, also 2 and 59.The prime factorization of 118 is 2 x 59.A factor = any number which can be divided into the given number with no remainder.1 and. 118