0
What else can I help you with?
Are 68 and 118 relatively prime?
No.
Are 8 and 3 relatively prime?
Yes, they are relatively prime.
Is 68 and 118 relatively prime?
NO. Because they have 2 as their common factor aside from 1.
Are 8 and 18 relatively prime?
no
Is 8 a relatively prime?
no it isn't because 4x2 =8.
Are 8 and 9 relatively prime?
Yes.
Are 68 and 118 relatively prime numbers?
No. They both contain the factor 2. 68 = 2 x 2 x 17 118 = 2 x 59 Their LCM is 4012, not 68 x 118 = 8024
Are 7 and 21 relatively prime?
27 is not a prime number and i dont know about 117 but i dont think its a composite # * * * * * The person who gave the above answer has no understanding of "relative primes". Or primes, for that matter. Neither 8 nor 9 is a prime BUT 8 and 9 are relatively prime (or co-prime) because they have no factor in common. That is what relatively prime means. 117 is not a prime, even if the previous answerer thinks otherwise. 27 and 117 are not relatively prime because both are divisible by 3.
Is 9 and 8 relatively prime?
No neither of them are because 3x3=9 so it is not prime. 8 is not either because 2x4=8
Are 64 and 144 relatively prime?
No, 64 and 144 are not relatively prime. To be relatively prime, the only common factor they could have would be 1. They have other common factors such as 2, 4, 8 and 16.
Are 3 and 52 relatively prime?
A number cannot be "relatively prime" except in relation to another number. For example, 8 and 15 are relatively primebecause they contain no prime factors in common.
Is 384 and 945 relatively prime?
No they are not.Two numbers are relatively prime if their greatest common factor is 1.For example, 8 and 15 are relatively prime.
