Rational numbers are infinitely dense and so there is no such number. If for example, you considered F1 to be the fraction that was closet to 0 then what about half that number? F2 = (F1)/2 is closer to 0. And then what about F3 = (F2)/2? This could go on for ever.
It is -1 or 1 because they are both integers
Fractions are infinitely dense and this means that between any two fractions there an infinite number of fractions. If any fraction, f, laid claims to being the nearest, there would be infinitely many fractions between 0 and f and so infinitely many fractions which were closer to 0. This means that f could not be the closest. The argument can be used again and again and so there cannot be a fraction closest to 0.
The integer/whole number closet to 0.1 is zero. If you can use decimal numbers, you will always be able to come up with a number closer to 0.1 than anyother number (exept 0.1 itself). For example 0.100000001 is very close to 0.1, but 0.10000000000000001 is even closer.
Yes, unless the number used for multiplication is 0. In that case you will have 0/0 which is not defined.
( 0 )/(any number) is.
1/infinity is the smallest fraction possible, but what number line the question is referring to is not specified so that's the only thing that can be stated here.
It is: 1 or -1
It is 0, but, if you insist, it can be written as 0/3.
It is -1 or 1 because they are both integers
-2/8 or -1/4 would go left of the 0 on the number line
Fractions are infinitely dense and this means that between any two fractions there an infinite number of fractions. If any fraction, f, laid claims to being the nearest, there would be infinitely many fractions between 0 and f and so infinitely many fractions which were closer to 0. This means that f could not be the closest. The argument can be used again and again and so there cannot be a fraction closest to 0.
There are infinitely many fractions and decimals between 0 and 1.
There is no possible answer. For any given fraction, half that fraction is another fraction and it will be closer to 0. And then half of that will be closer still, and then half of that ... . Hope you get the idea.
To represent a fraction on a number line using division, you can express the fraction as the division of its numerator by its denominator. For example, to show the fraction 3/4 on a number line, you would divide the segment between 0 and 1 into 4 equal parts, and then count 3 parts from 0 to locate the point representing 3/4. Thus, you can say, "3 divided by 4 equals 0.75, which corresponds to the point on the number line at 3/4."
To use a number line to find a whole number represented by a fraction, first identify the whole numbers that the fraction falls between. For example, if you have the fraction ( \frac{3}{4} ), locate 0 and 1 on the number line. Divide the segment between these whole numbers into equal parts corresponding to the denominator (4 parts in this case), then count 3 parts from 0 to find ( \frac{3}{4} ). This visual representation helps you understand the position of the fraction relative to whole numbers.
Of course 0 is not a fraction, when it is over 0 it is a whole number.
2 fifths is equivalent to 0.4, which is closer to 0 than it is to 0.5 (1 half) or 1. To determine this, you can think of the number line where 0 is closer to 0.4 than 0.5, making 0 the closest whole number.