absolute of -98=98
No. If the square root of 98 was an integer, 98 would be a perfect square.
It is 18 or 20
98 is an integer and there is no sensible way of representing it as a mixed fraction.
98 of them.
absolute of -98=98
321 is an integer, so the closest integer would be 321. (If 321 itself doesn't count, 322 and 320 are the same distance from it, and are the next closest.)
No - 0.8 is a decimal number, not an integer. The closest integer is 1.
8 is an integer, so the answer is 8
No. If the square root of 98 was an integer, 98 would be a perfect square.
98
It is 18 or 20
98 is an integer and there is no sensible way of representing it as a mixed fraction.
The answer is 98.
98 of them.
The closest integer to the left of 4.7 on the number line is 4. Since 4.7 is closer to 5 than it is to 4, the integer to the left of 4.7 is 4. This is because integers are whole numbers without any decimal or fractional parts, so the closest integer to the left of 4.7 is 4.
You can't write a non-integer as an integer. You can round it to the closest integer if you like, but it's not exactly the same number.