They are not relatively prime. To be relatively prime, the only common factor they could have would be the number 1. Both also have the number 3 as a common factor, so they are not relatively prime.
An easy way to find a number relatively prime to another number is to find a nearby prime number. For example, 53 is relatively prime with 50. The following pairs are relatively prime. 3, 50 19, 50 37, 50 49, 50 50, 69 50, 201 50, 341 Any number that is not divisible by 2 or 5 will be relatively prime to 50.
Since 13 is a prime number (i.e., 13 is the only factor of 13), any number that is not a multiple of 13 is relatively prime to it.
Infinitely many numbers are relatively prime to 37. Because 37 is a prime number, all other numbers are relatively prime to it.
15 is relatively prime.
There is no relatively prime number for 10. Relatively Prime numbers are sets of two or more numbers having 1 as their greatest common factor (gcf). All even numbers have 2 as a common factor, so no even number is relatively prime with any other even number.
A number cannot be relatively prime number by itself. It can only be relatively prime in the context of (relativeto) another number. That requires the two numbers not to have any prime factors in common.
Yes, they are relatively prime.
10 and 35 are not relatively prime because they share the prime factor 5.
Any prime number is relatively prime to any other prime number.
No, 100 and 202 are not relatively prime. Relatively prime numbers only have the number 1 as a common factor. The number 1 is a common factor for them, but the number 2 is another common factor that they have, so they are not relatively prime.
A number is relatively prime to another number or set of numbers when their GCF is 1.
41 is relatively prime.
It can be. 16 is relatively prime with 25.
The prime factors of 4 are 2 and 2. The prime factors of 9 are 3 and 3. They do not have any prime factors in common, so they are relatively prime.
They are not relatively prime. To be relatively prime, the only common factor they could have would be the number 1. Both also have the number 3 as a common factor, so they are not relatively prime.
Two numbers are relatively prime if they have no factor in common. But a single number cannot be relatively prime.