24 and 49 are relatively prime. Their only common factor is 1. All the other pairs have more than the number 1 as a common factor.
No, 102 and 321 are not relatively prime. Relatively prime numbers only have the number 1 as a common factor. 102 and 321 have other common factors, like 3.
There are 27 prime numbers less than 102.
The prime numbers between 102 and 113 are 103, 107, and 109.
A prime number has only 2 factors which are 1 and itself. Composite numbers are everything else except 1 and 0. 1 and 0 are neither prime, nor composite. 45 and 102 are both composite.
97 and 5
No, 102 and 321 are not relatively prime. Relatively prime numbers only have the number 1 as a common factor. 102 and 321 have other common factors, like 3.
There are 27 prime numbers less than 102.
The prime numbers between 102 and 113 are 103, 107, and 109.
A prime number has only 2 factors which are 1 and itself. Composite numbers are everything else except 1 and 0. 1 and 0 are neither prime, nor composite. 45 and 102 are both composite.
102 has three different prime factors so there are no TWO numbers as required by the question.
No, they're both divisible by three.
Any multiple of 3 will not be relatively prime to 9 because they will both have 3 as a common factor. Some of these numbers are 3, 6, 12, 39, 102, and 372.
103 is the only one.
They are: 103 107 109 and 113
103 107 109 113.
They are: 97+5 = 102
102