Best Answer

Any multiple of 3 will not be relatively prime to 9 because they will both have 3 as a common factor. Some of these numbers are 3, 6, 12, 39, 102, and 372.

More answers

Anything that isn't nine or one of its multiples.

Q: What is a number that is not relatively prime to 9?

Write your answer...

Submit

Still have questions?

Continue Learning about Movies & Television

The prime factors of 4 are 2 and 2. The prime factors of 9 are 3 and 3. They do not have any prime factors in common, so they are relatively prime.

27 is not a prime number and i dont know about 117 but i dont think its a composite # * * * * * The person who gave the above answer has no understanding of "relative primes". Or primes, for that matter. Neither 8 nor 9 is a prime BUT 8 and 9 are relatively prime (or co-prime) because they have no factor in common. That is what relatively prime means. 117 is not a prime, even if the previous answerer thinks otherwise. 27 and 117 are not relatively prime because both are divisible by 3.

No, 100 and 202 are not relatively prime. Relatively prime numbers only have the number 1 as a common factor. The number 1 is a common factor for them, but the number 2 is another common factor that they have, so they are not relatively prime.

209 is relatively prime (as is 211).

A number cannot be "relatively prime" except in relation to another number. For example, 8 and 15 are relatively primebecause they contain no prime factors in common.

Related questions

Nine can only be relatively prime when compared to another number or set of numbers. 9 is relatively prime to 4, 9 is not relatively prime to 12.

Numbers are considered relatively prime if they have no prime factors in common, that is, that their GCF is 1. 4 and 9 are relatively prime.

Numbers are co-prime, or relatively prime, if their GCF is 1. 4 and 9 are relatively prime.

25, among others.

The prime factors of 4 are 2 and 2. The prime factors of 9 are 3 and 3. They do not have any prime factors in common, so they are relatively prime.

Yes, 9 and 23 are relatively prime.

9 and 16 are relatively prime.

27 is not a prime number and i dont know about 117 but i dont think its a composite # * * * * * The person who gave the above answer has no understanding of "relative primes". Or primes, for that matter. Neither 8 nor 9 is a prime BUT 8 and 9 are relatively prime (or co-prime) because they have no factor in common. That is what relatively prime means. 117 is not a prime, even if the previous answerer thinks otherwise. 27 and 117 are not relatively prime because both are divisible by 3.

To be relatively prime, it would have to be compared to another number. When it is, if the GCF, or greatest common factor is 1, then it is relatively prime. 45 and 9 = NO because they have 9 in common. 45 and 31 = Yes because they only have 1 as a common factor.

The GCF of 9 and 26 is 1. 9 and 26 are relatively prime.

Yes, 9 and 16 are relatively prime. They do not have any prime factors in common.

Any prime number is relatively prime to any other prime number.