No. There is no number n, such that the sum of the first n consecutive integers is 1,000. Here's why: Let S = S(n) = 1 + 2 + 3 + . . . + n. Then, S = n(n + 1) / 2. There are several ways you can derive this formula; but you might find it helpful to refer to this: http://mathworld.wolfram.com/ArithmeticSeries.html or any of a large number of similar sources. (I tried Wiki, but down-loading took forever!) If you know S(n) (in this case, 1,000) and wish to find n, you have only to solve: n² + n = 2S = 2000. This is not readily factorised; but we can try completing the square: 2S = n² + n = 2,000; whence, n² + n + ¼ = (n + ½)² = 2,000¼, and n = √2,000.25 - 0.5. To the nearest integer, n = 44, approximately; but this is inexact, of course. Let's see what happens when we try this result. We get 2S(44) = n² + n = 44 * 45 = 1,980; whence, S(45) = 990, which is just a little too small; and any n smaller than 44 would give an S(n) that is even smaller. You can easily check this result, if you like: 1 + 2 + 3 + . . . + 22 + 23 + . . . + 42 + 43 + 44 = (1 + 44) + (2 + 43) + (3 + 42) + . . . + (22 + 23) {this makes 22 pairs, each adding up to 45.} = 45 * 22 = 990. On the other hand, S(45) = S(44) + 45 = 990 + 45 = 1,035, which is just a little too large; and any n larger than 45 would give an S(n) that is even larger. We may conclude, then, that no integer n satisfies the requirement that we have placed on it.
Chat with our AI personalities
-4, -2, 0, and 2 are the four consecutive even integers. When you add them up they equal -4.
generally you would multiply a number by itself, but i have found out a marvelous trick, and it is pretty easy since I am only a child, but starting with 1, if you add three, you get four, the next square number. then you add five to get nine the next square number, then seven to get sixteen and so on. So in simpler terms you take one and add three to get the next square number, then add five, then seven counting by odd numbers. Here is an equation. the bold numbers are the square numbers and the Italic numbers are the progressing odd numbers.1+3= 4+5= 9+7=16and so on.
There are many pairs of numbers that add of to 64. One is (1,63), and the product is 63. Another is (2,62), and the product is 124. There seems to be something missing from the question, perhaps some constraint on the product. Please restate the question.
To find the mean of a set of numbers, you add all the numbers together and then divide by the total number of values. In this case, the sum of 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, and 1.5 is 5.4. Dividing 5.4 by 4 (the total number of values) gives you a mean of 1.35.
To find the average, we add all the numbers together and divide by the amount of numbers 36+59+62+21=178 4 numbers were added up so we divide by 4 178/4=44.5 So the average is 44.5