meant to be e^x = 2e^1-2x
Chat with our AI personalities
e2x + ex = 0e2x = -exe2x / ex = -1ex = -1x = ln(-1)Actually, that's just a restatement of the original problem, but that'sas far as you can go with it, because there's no such thing as the log(or the ln) of a negative number. Your equation has no solution.
ex = x3 This has two solutions: x = 4.5364... and x = 1.85718... Plot the graph of each and you can see the intersections.
Because the derivative of e^x is e^x (the original function back again). This is the only function that has this behavior.
using Laplace transform, we have: sY(s) = Y(s) + 1/(s2) ---> (s-1)Y(s) = 1/(s2), and Y(s) = 1/[(s2)(s-1)]From the Laplace table, this is ex - x -1, which satisfies the original differential eq.derivative of [ex - x -1] = ex -1; so, ex - 1 = ex - x - 1 + xto account for initial conditions, we need to multiply the ex term by a constant CSo y = C*ex - x - 1, and y' = C*ex - 1, with the constant C, to be determined from the initial conditions.
(ex)3=e3x, so int[(ex)3dx]=int[e3xdx]=e3x/3 the integral ex^3 involves a complex function useful only to integrations such as this known as the exponential integral, or En(x). The integral is:-(1/3)x*E2/3(-x3). To solve this integral, and for more information on the exponential integral, go to http://integrals.wolfram.com/index.jsp?expr=e^(x^3)&random=false