4.50 dollars would round to 4 dollars.
But beware!
Some people advise you always to round up 0.5. Others say always round down. The problem with either approach is as follows:
In the first case
If the number is 0.0 you don't need to round
If the number is 0.1, 0.2, 0.3 or 0.4 you round down
If the number is 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8 or 0.9 you round up
So 4 downs and 5 ups (and one no change).
Net Result: you introduce an upward bias.
In the second scenario, you introduce a downward bias through rounding.
Possible solution:
Round up from 0.5 half the time, round down the other half. That satisfies the bias problem but introduces another - that of reproducibility. If someone else were to look at your data would they round up/down the same way you did? Unlikely. You need a system which will round 0.5 up half the time and down half the time but where the decision is made for you.
Hence the best solution is the answer given above: Round up or down so that the new last digit is even.
What is the nearest 100 of 450
To the nearest ten cents it will round up to give 67.20 as your answer. It would round down to 67 for the nearest dollar.
Yes, it can be done.
48.91 to the nearest dollar is 49.00
$7.01 to the nearest dollar is $7.00
It is: 450
$18.25 rounded to the nearest dollar is $18.
$4.12 rounded to the nearest dollar is $4.00
Well, honey, if you want to round 6.32 to the nearest dollar, you simply look at the cents. Since 32 cents is less than 50 cents, you round down. So, 6.32 rounded to the nearest dollar is 6 dollars. Easy peasy lemon squeezy!
0.56 rounded to nearest dollar is $1.00
100.9 rounded to the nearest dollar is 101.
$3.49 rounded to the nearest dollar is $3.00