Sample size calculations for a continuous outcome require specification of the anticipated variance; inaccurate specification can result in an underpowered or overpowered study. For this reason, adaptive methods whereby sample size is recalculated using the variance of a subsample have become increasingly popular. The first proposal of this type (Stein, 1945, Annals of Mathematical Statistics 16, 243-258) used all of the data to estimate the mean difference but only the first stage data to estimate the variance. Stein's procedure is not commonly used because many people perceive it as ignoring relevant data. This is especially problematic when the first stage sample size is small, as would be the case if the anticipated total sample size were small. A more naive approach uses in the denominator of the final test statistic the variance estimate based on all of the data. Applying the Helmert transformation, we show why this naive approach underestimates the true variance and how to construct an unbiased estimate that uses all of the data. We prove that the type I error rate of our procedure cannot exceed alpha.
Double and multiple sampling plans were invented to give a questionable lot another chance. For example, if in double sampling the results of the first sample are not conclusive with regard to accepting or rejecting, a second sample is taken. Application of double sampling requires that a first sample of size n1 is taken at random from the (large) lot. The number of defectives is then counted and compared to the first sample's acceptance number a1 and rejection number r1. Denote the number of defectives in sample 1 by d1 and in sample 2 by d2, then:
If d1 a1, the lot is accepted.
If d1 r1, the lot is rejected.
If a1 < d1 < r1, a second sample is taken.
If a second sample of size n2 is taken, the number of defectives, d2, is counted. The total number of defectives is D2 = d1 + d2. Now this is compared to the acceptance number a2 and the rejection number r2 of sample 2. In double sampling, r2 = a2 + 1 to ensure a decision on the sample.
If D2 a2, the lot is accepted.
If D2 r2, the lot is rejected.
The sampling rate must be at least double the highest frequency component of the modulating signal in order to avoid frequency aliasing.
Random Sampling is the most common sampling technique
conclusion to the statistics sampling
Sampling is needed in order to determine the properties of a distribution or a population. Sampling allows the scientist to determine the variance in an estimate.
sampling theorem is defined as , the sampling frequency should be greater than or equal to 2*maximum frequency, and the frequency should be bounded.. i,e fs=2*fmax where fs= sampling frequency
Not less than double the highest frequency component of the signal you're sampling.
Two-phase sampling involves selecting initial units from a population through one sampling technique and subsequently selecting final units from the initially drawn units using a different sampling technique. Double sampling, on the other hand, involves selecting two independent samples from the same population, where the second sample is used to check the results of the first sample and make adjustments if needed.
They include: Simple random sampling, Systematic sampling, Stratified sampling, Quota sampling, and Cluster sampling.
Answer is Quota sampling. Its one of the method of non-probability sampling.
Sampling techniques in researching involves to types of sampling. The probability sampling and the non-probability sampling. Simple random is an example of probability sampling.
You are correct; convenience sampling is not random sampling.
1) Simple random sampling 2) Systematic sampling 3) Stratified sampling 4) Cluster sampling 5) Probability proportional to size sampling 6) Matched random sampling 7) Quota sampling 8) Convenience sampling 9) Line-intercept sampling 10) Panel sampling
The sampling rate must be at least double the highest frequency component of the modulating signal in order to avoid frequency aliasing.
Sampling and Non sampling errors
Convenience sampling or quota sampling
What is the difference between quota sampling and cluster sampling
Simple Random Sample Stratified Random Sampling Cluster Sampling Systematic Sampling Convenience Sampling