Ah hah! That little word "which" is pretty much a giveaway ... I'll just bet there was
some kind of a list of choices that was supposed to go along with the question, but
somehow got lost.
Anyway, the correct inequality is: 3 < x < 13 .
5 < x < 9
4 < x < 20
No
A triangle with all angles measuring less than 90 degrees?That's an 'acute' triangle.
A triangle with one angle measuring 90˚ is a right triangleIt's a right triangle because the 90˚ angle is a right angle
5 < x < 9
4 < x < 20
This is not an equilateral triangle.
No
Sure, that is exactly what the triangle inequality tells us!
The triangle inequality theorem states that any side of a triangle is always shorter than the sum of the other two sides.
A triangle can only exist if the lengths of its sides satisfy the triangle inequality theorem, which states that the sum of the lengths of any two sides must be greater than the length of the third side. Since you've provided only one side length (15150.03), we cannot determine if a triangle is possible without the lengths of the other two sides. If you provide additional side lengths, we can assess their validity based on the triangle inequality.
It is not possible to have a triangle with sides of those lengths. The two shortest sides of a triangle must always add to more than the longest side. This is known as the triangle inequality.
Yes, it is possible to draw a scalene triangle with sides measuring 7 inches, 7 inches, and 8 inches. However, since two sides are equal (7 inches each), this triangle is actually an isosceles triangle, not a scalene triangle. A scalene triangle has all sides of different lengths. Therefore, for a scalene triangle, all three sides must have different measurements.
no.
NO!!!! Because two sides are the same length at 7 inches each/ Hence it is an Isosceles Triangle.
Yes simply with a protractor and a measuring device.