answersLogoWhite

0

Ah hah! That little word "which" is pretty much a giveaway ... I'll just bet there was

some kind of a list of choices that was supposed to go along with the question, but

somehow got lost.

Anyway, the correct inequality is: 3 < x < 13 .

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

A triangle has sides measuring 2 inches and 7 inches. If x represents the length in inches of the third side which inequality gives the range of possible values for x?

5 < x < 9


A triangle has sides measuring 8 inches and 12 inches. If x represents the length in inches of the third side which inequality gives the range of possible values for x?

4 < x < 20


An equilateral triangle with sides measuring 8cm 9cm and 10 cm?

This is not an equilateral triangle.


Is it possible to draw a right triangle with an exterior angle measuring 88?

No


Given three positive real numbers satisfying the triangle inequalities is it always possible to find a triangle having these as the dimensions?

Sure, that is exactly what the triangle inequality tells us!


What does the triangle inequality theorem state?

The triangle inequality theorem states that any side of a triangle is always shorter than the sum of the other two sides.


Is it possible for a triangle to have sides with 15150.03?

A triangle can only exist if the lengths of its sides satisfy the triangle inequality theorem, which states that the sum of the lengths of any two sides must be greater than the length of the third side. Since you've provided only one side length (15150.03), we cannot determine if a triangle is possible without the lengths of the other two sides. If you provide additional side lengths, we can assess their validity based on the triangle inequality.


The side of a triangle 78cm 20 cm and 22cm find its area?

It is not possible to have a triangle with sides of those lengths. The two shortest sides of a triangle must always add to more than the longest side. This is known as the triangle inequality.


Is it possible to draw a scalene triangle measuring 7in 7in and 8in?

Yes, it is possible to draw a scalene triangle with sides measuring 7 inches, 7 inches, and 8 inches. However, since two sides are equal (7 inches each), this triangle is actually an isosceles triangle, not a scalene triangle. A scalene triangle has all sides of different lengths. Therefore, for a scalene triangle, all three sides must have different measurements.


Can two sides be congruent in the triangle inequality?

no.


Is it possible to make a scalene triangle with sides measuring 7in 7in 8in?

NO!!!! Because two sides are the same length at 7 inches each/ Hence it is an Isosceles Triangle.


Is it possible to solve a right triangle without using Pythagorean theorem?

Yes simply with a protractor and a measuring device.