5 < x < 9
4 < x < 20
Ah hah! That little word "which" is pretty much a giveaway ... I'll just bet there wassome kind of a list of choices that was supposed to go along with the question, butsomehow got lost.Anyway, the correct inequality is: 3 < x < 13 .
No
A triangle with all angles measuring less than 90 degrees?That's an 'acute' triangle.
A triangle with one angle measuring 90˚ is a right triangleIt's a right triangle because the 90˚ angle is a right angle
4 < x < 20
The triangle with one side measuring 4 inches and two sides measuring 6 inches is an isosceles triangle. In this type of triangle, two sides are of equal length, which in this case are the two 6-inch sides, while the third side is different. Additionally, the triangle satisfies the triangle inequality theorem, confirming that it can exist.
Ah hah! That little word "which" is pretty much a giveaway ... I'll just bet there wassome kind of a list of choices that was supposed to go along with the question, butsomehow got lost.Anyway, the correct inequality is: 3 < x < 13 .
This is not an equilateral triangle.
No
Sure, that is exactly what the triangle inequality tells us!
The triangle inequality theorem states that any side of a triangle is always shorter than the sum of the other two sides.
A triangle can only exist if the lengths of its sides satisfy the triangle inequality theorem, which states that the sum of the lengths of any two sides must be greater than the length of the third side. Since you've provided only one side length (15150.03), we cannot determine if a triangle is possible without the lengths of the other two sides. If you provide additional side lengths, we can assess their validity based on the triangle inequality.
It is not possible to have a triangle with sides of those lengths. The two shortest sides of a triangle must always add to more than the longest side. This is known as the triangle inequality.
Yes, it is possible to draw a scalene triangle with sides measuring 7 inches, 7 inches, and 8 inches. However, since two sides are equal (7 inches each), this triangle is actually an isosceles triangle, not a scalene triangle. A scalene triangle has all sides of different lengths. Therefore, for a scalene triangle, all three sides must have different measurements.
To prove the triangle inequality using proof by cases, we analyze the possible relationships between the sides of the triangle. For two sides (a) and (b), we consider three cases: when both (a) and (b) are positive, when one is zero, and when one or both are negative. In each case, we show that the sum of the lengths of any two sides is always greater than or equal to the length of the remaining side, thereby satisfying the triangle inequality: (a + b \geq c), (a + c \geq b), and (b + c \geq a). This structured approach confirms the validity of the inequality under all possible scenarios.
no.