0
A triangle has two sides that have lengths of 8 cm and 14 cm what lengths could not represent the length of the third side?
7
What else can I help you with?
Which three measurements could be the length of the sides of a triangle?
The list that accompanies the question doesn't contain any numbers that could be the lengths of the sides of a triangle.
A triangle has two sides of lengths 5 and 13. What value could the length of the third side be Check all that apply?
10
What are the side lengths of a triangle with an area of 6?
If its a right angle triangle then its side lengths could be 3, 4 and 5
In triangle XYZ the length of side XY is 24 mm and the length of side YZ is 36 mm. Which of the following could be the length of side XZ?
No lengths have been given but in general the sum of the two smaller sides of a triangle must be greater than its largest side.
Which of the following could be the ratio of the length of a 30-60-90 to the length of its hypotenuse?
There's no such thing as the "length of a 30-60-90". The ratios of the lengths of the legs of such a triangle to the length of the hypotenuse are 1/2 and 1/2(sqrt(3).
Does 5cm 5cm 5cm make a triangle?
5cm, 5cm, and 5cm could represent the lengths of the sides of an equilateral triangle, or might indicate the length, width, and height of a cube.
What set of lengths could not be the lengths of the sides of a triangle?
If any of its 2 sides is not greater than its third in length then a triangle can't be formed.
Could 3 3 5 represent the length of a triangle?
Sure, why not?
Which three measurements could be the length of the sides of a triangle?
The list that accompanies the question doesn't contain any numbers that could be the lengths of the sides of a triangle.
Could 8 8 and 8 represent the length of the sides of a triangle?
Yes and it would be an equilateral triangle.
Could 3 5 and 7 represent the length of the sides of a right triangle?
no it cannot represent as in angle triangle rule it doesnt prove that term
What are the length that could be a triangle?
Any triplet provided only that any two lengths are greater than the third.
How are isosceles and scalene different?
An isosceles triangle has two sides that are equal length, and the other side would be a different length. A right triangle could be an isosceles triangle. On the other hand, a scalene triangle has all of its sides different lengths.
What is an isosceles and scalene?
They are triangles. An isosceles triangle has two sides that are equal length, and the other side would be a different length. A right triangle could be an isosceles triangle. On the other hand, a scalene triangle has all of its sides different lengths.
A triangle has two sides of lengths 5 and 13. What value could the length of the third side be Check all that apply?
10
If two sides of a triangle are 3 and 7what is the possible lengths for the third side of the triangle?
The last side length could be between 4 units and 10 units inclusive.
Which set of numbers can not represent the lengths of the sides of a triangle?
There are lots of sets of numbers that fit that definition! But the important thing to remember about triangles is the Third Side Rule, or the Triangle Inequality, which states: the length of a side of a triangle is less than the sum of the lengths of the other two sides and greater than the difference of the lengths of the other two sides. So you can have a triangle with sides of 3, 4 and 5 because 3 < 4 + 5, 4 < 3 + 5 and 5 < 3 + 4; and because 3 > 5 - 4, 4 > 5 - 3 and 5 > 4 - 3. But you can't have a triangle with sides 1, 2 and 8, for example. Just imagine three pieces of wood or three straws with lengths 1, 2 and 8. Put the longest piece, 8, horizontally on the table. Then put the other two, one at each end of the longest piece. Could those two shorter sides ever meet to form a triangle? No, never!-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The length is always positive, so that all real positive numbers can represent the length of sides of a triangle: {x| x > 0}.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Whoever added that to my answer, sorry, I beg to differ! The question asked what SET of numbers cannot represent the lengths of the sides of a triangle. There are infinite possibilities for that. While the lengths are always a set of real positive numbers, not every possible set of real positive numbers is a potential set of numbers that represent the lengths of the sides of a triangle!
