0
What else can I help you with?
Which types of statements can justify the steps of proof?
Theorems, definitions, corollaries, and postulates
Which part of a 2-column proof is the conclusion of the conjecture?
Which part of a 2-column proof is the hypothesis of the conjecture? GIVEN
What are the steps to writing an Indirect Proof in Geometry?
Identify the conjecture to be proven.Assume the opposite of the conclusion is true.Use direct reasoning to show that the assumption leads to a contradiction.Conclude that the assumption is false and hence that the original conjecture must be true.
What is never used to justify statements made in the proof of a new theorem?
a conjecture is never used , although postulates , previously proven theorems and definitions are used. so the answer is CONJECTURE. btw r u referring to the birmingham university chapter 2 speedback assignment?
What types of statement can be used to explain the steps of a proof?
The corollaries types of statement is what is used to explain the steps of a proof.
Which of the following types of statement cannot be used to justify the steps of a proof check all that apply a guess b theorem c conjecture d postulate?
Guess Conjecture
What can justify the steps of a proof?
Mathematical logic.
Can a postulate be used to justify the steps of a proof?
no
What statements can justify the steps of a proof?
Postulates Definitions Corollaries
Can a conjucture be used to justify the steps of a proof?
Yes, of course.
What is a type of statement that can be used to justify the steps of a proof?
conclusion
What types of statements can justify the steps of a proof?
theoremPostulates(apex)postulatesdefinitioncollaries
Which types of statements can justify the steps of proof?
Theorems, definitions, corollaries, and postulates
What types of statements cannot justify the steps of a proof?
Logically invalid statements.
Which of the following types of statement cannot be used to explain the steps of a proof Check all that apply?
Conjecture and Guess.
What types of statement cannot be used to justify the steps of proof?
In a proof, statements that are purely opinion-based or subjective, such as personal beliefs or interpretations, cannot be used to justify steps. Additionally, unsupported assertions that lack logical reasoning or empirical evidence, as well as circular reasoning where the conclusion is included in one of the premises, are also invalid. Lastly, statements that are not universally accepted or established laws, such as conjectures that have not been proven, cannot justify proof steps.
Which part of a 2-column proof is the conclusion of the conjecture?
Which part of a 2-column proof is the hypothesis of the conjecture? GIVEN
