0
What else can I help you with?
Can a postulate be used to justify the steps of a proof?
no
What statements can justify the steps of a proof?
Postulates Definitions Corollaries
Can a conjucture be used to justify the steps of a proof?
Yes, of course.
What types of statements can justify the steps of a proof?
theoremPostulates(apex)postulatesdefinitioncollaries
What types of statements cannot justify the steps of a proof?
Logically invalid statements.
Can a conjecture justify steps of a proof?
No
Can a postulate be used to justify the steps of a proof?
no
What statements can justify the steps of a proof?
Postulates Definitions Corollaries
Can a conjucture be used to justify the steps of a proof?
Yes, of course.
What is a type of statement that can be used to justify the steps of a proof?
conclusion
What types of statements can justify the steps of a proof?
theoremPostulates(apex)postulatesdefinitioncollaries
Which types of statements can justify the steps of proof?
Theorems, definitions, corollaries, and postulates
What types of statements cannot justify the steps of a proof?
Logically invalid statements.
What types of statement cannot be used to justify the steps of proof?
In a proof, statements that are purely opinion-based or subjective, such as personal beliefs or interpretations, cannot be used to justify steps. Additionally, unsupported assertions that lack logical reasoning or empirical evidence, as well as circular reasoning where the conclusion is included in one of the premises, are also invalid. Lastly, statements that are not universally accepted or established laws, such as conjectures that have not been proven, cannot justify proof steps.
Can a postulate be used to explain the steps of a proof?
Yes, a postulate can be used to explain the steps of a proof as it provides foundational assumptions that are accepted without proof. In a proof, postulates serve as starting points or premises from which logical deductions can be made. By referencing postulates, one can justify certain steps in the proof, helping to establish the validity of the overall argument. This creates a structured framework for demonstrating theorems or propositions.
Which statement that cannot be used to justify the steps of a proof?
Since you didn't include the statements in your question there is no way for us to know
Which of the following types of statement cannot be used to justify the steps of a proof check all that apply a guess b theorem c conjecture d postulate?
Guess Conjecture
