Wikipedia defines a trapezium (trapezoid) as a quadrilateral with one pair of parallel sides. However, it also acknowledges that there is disagreement as to whether or not that means exactly one pair or at least one pair.
Under the first definition a trapezium could not be a square whereas under the second, it would.
Sorry not to give you an unambiguous answer but ...
A square can't be a trapezoid because it has two parellel sizes.
No a square is not a trapezoid
Quadrelateral
'A square is a type of rectangle, a rectangle is a type of paralellogram, a paralellogram is a type of trapezoid, a trapezoid is a type of quadrilateral.
Trapezoid. The rectangle, square, and rhombus are all parallelograms. The Trapezoid is a solid: a prism of trapezium cross-section.
Square = parallelogram and a square trapezoid = trapezoid Parallelogram = Parallelogram
a trapezoid is slanted and a square is not
a trapezoid is slanted and a square is not
No, it is either a trapezoid or a square.
Look at the amazing four-sided trapezoid! That 'square' is not square, it is a trapezoid.
A square can't be a trapezoid because it has two parellel sizes.
A square can't be a trapezoid because it has two parellel sizes.
No a square is not a trapezoid
No, a square is not a trapezoid.
Quadrelateral
Yes because if you square root the area of a trapezoid that will give you the side of a square
'A square is a type of rectangle, a rectangle is a type of paralellogram, a paralellogram is a type of trapezoid, a trapezoid is a type of quadrilateral.