answersLogoWhite

0

There exists an N such that for all n>N, for any x. Now let n>N, and consider the continuous function . Since it is continuous, there exists a such that if , then . Then so the function f(x) is continuous.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

State and prove Arzela Ascoli theorem?

I will give a link that explains and proves the theorem.


State and prove fundamental theorem of cyclic groups?

..?


Can a corollary be used to prove a theorem?

Yes, the corollary to one theorem can be used to prove another theorem.


How do you prove theorem 3.6.1?

Theorem 8.11 in what book?


How do you find the standard form after you have used the De Moivre's theorem?

(cos0 + i sin0) m = (cosm0 + i sinm0)


How do you solve a remainder theorem?

You cannot solve a theorem: you can prove the theorem or you can solve a question based on the remainder theorem.


What theorem can you use to prove that AEB is congruent to CED?

asa theorem


How do you show mathematically that the error is reduced when averaging is done?

You need to be able to prove the Central Limit Theorem, which is beyond the scope of high school mathematics.


What elements are necessary for a geometric proof?

A theorem to prove. A series of logical statements. A series of reasons for the statements. answer theorem to prove


What theorem is used to prove a segment is a bisector?

A segment need not be a bisector. No theorem can be used to prove something that may not be true!


How do you use theorem to prove statements?

To use a theorem to prove statements, you first need to identify the relevant theorem that applies to the situation at hand. Next, you clearly state the hypotheses of the theorem and verify that they hold true for your specific case. Then, you apply the theorem's conclusion to derive the desired result, ensuring that each step in your argument logically follows from the theorem and any established definitions or previously proven results. Finally, you summarize how the theorem provides the necessary justification for your statement.


which congruence postulate or theorem would you use to prove MEX?

HL congruence theorem