0
True or false Postulates and axioms are statements which are accepted without question or justification?
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
True
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Can postulates be accepted without question or justification?
True
What is statement about identity crisis is true?
They can occur at any stage in life.
If line KL is a bisector of FH at point J which statements is true?
With the limited information provided by the question, the only statement which must be true is FJ = JH.
RST JKL RS 8 cm JK 12 cm RST 32 cm find the perimeter of JKL?
The question, as it appears, cannot be answered without the following assumptions - none of which have any justification for making them.RST and JKL are triangles. The triangles are similar and in correspondence follows their naming. If that is true then the perimeter of JKL is 48 cm.
If 4 plus x4 3 plus yy then x4 3y?
The browser used by this site for posting questions is rubbish. We have complained about it but the powers that be are not doing anything about it. The consequence is that most mathematical symbols are not accepted and so all that I can see is of your question is:"If 4 plus x4 3 plus yy then x4 3y?"It is difficult to be sure, but making an informed guess as to what might be missing, I would say that the answer is NO. There is no solution for y.
Can postulates be accepted without question or justification?
True
How do you use justification in a sentence?
Justify your opinion with relevant evidence from the text. The decision to implement new policies was justified by the increase in productivity. She tried to justify her actions by explaining the reasoning behind them.
What is accepted without proof in a logical system?
Axioms and Posulates -apex
What does the word challenge?
A demand for explanation or justification; a calling into question.
Are not congruence theorems or postulates?
Putting a question mark at the end of a few words does not make it a sensible question. Please try again.
Can there ever be justification for breaking the law?
[A perennial law school question.] Under extenuating circumstances there can be moral justification for breaking a law. However there can never be any justification for living a lawless life.
Which statements is true of the presidential elections of 1980 and 1984?
That depends entirely on the statements in question.
Which of the following statements about the atom did Rutherfords experiment support?
What are the 'statements' and which 'experiment' is meant to be 'supported' in this question.
Which two statements concerning networking standards are?
would need to see the two statements; not shown in question.
Identify various learning theories/philosophies a person can experience in his life with justification ?
please answer this question
Do imperative statements have question marks at the end?
No, dunkass.
On a company's set of financial statements?
What's your question
