As a passenger on a train or when climbing a ladder.
I think its true.....
What is an orthogonal line?
Some examples for parallel lines- railroad tracks, steps, buildings, paper, windows, ect. Some examples for perpendicular lines- stop sign, bridge, street intersection, driveway into a street, ect.
None.
railway tracks, an equals sign ( = ) or the ribs on a central heating radiator. A single line can't be parallel, unless there's another line present. The edges of the question box across from each other. | | | | Yes, the two letters 'el' in the word 'parallel'. Also, a pair of railroad tracks. Parallel lines never travel alone. It is very likely to have the thing you are looking at (the screen) having as least 2 parallel lines.
Real life example of parallel lines are railroad tracks and rows in a garden. Also the lines on a basketball court are parallel
Most houses are built with walls parallel to each other.
Railway lines with sleepers? Lines of latitude crossed by a line of longitude?
Did you mean "real world examples of parallel lines"? If so, railroad tracks are a perfect example.
True
In navigation, the direction of travel is determined by the angle made with the direction North (the bearing), measured in the clockwise direction. For this purpose it is assumed that longitudes are parallel on the sacle of the journeys.
I think its true.....
Parallel lines. Can be found in rectangles, parallelogram, regular polygon with even sides like square(opposite sides are parallel. Real life examples include door (unless you have a triangle door), fish tank (unless you keep goldfish or have one with weird shapes), mobile phones (most do have two parallel lines).
To solve real-life problems involving angle relationships in parallel lines and triangles, first, identify the parallel lines and any transversal lines that create corresponding, alternate interior, or interior angles. Use the properties of these angles, such as the fact that corresponding angles are equal and alternate interior angles are equal. For triangles, apply the triangle sum theorem, which states that the sum of the interior angles is always 180 degrees. By setting up equations based on these relationships, you can solve for unknown angles and apply this information to the specific context of your problem.
yes in 1973
the lines of the brooklin bridge
The idea or concept of parallel lines is defined by Euclidean geometry as lines that never cross. So the regular answer is: No, they never cross, because then they will not be parallel according to Euclid. But, I'm sure the questioner is not asking about Euclidean geometry but about reality. In this sense some people will say: No, parallel never cross because there is no such a thing in real life. Parallel lines only exist in our mind. But this answer is too simplistic. There is "reality" in our "ideal" concept of parallel lines. If reality was so disconnected from our geometric and logical constructs we would not be able to interact with the real world. We can walk, see and reason reality because we find circles, lines, logical constructs and 2 as the sum of 1 + 1, in the "real" world. Or at least, a very close approximation to that, though never "perfect" circles or lines. Kant clearly demonstrated that these ideas are "hard coded" in our mind, not learned, because we need this idea "framework" to rationalize perception in the first place. There has never been a society where 1+1=3 and where parallel lines cross at say, 100 feet. Questions like these are the beginning of modern philosophy, beginning with Plato who had not other option but to conclude that these ideas have an existence of their own in some kind of idea heaven. Of course the point is not whether this idea heaven exists, but to point out the real problems: Why do we have this constructs in our mind? What is the relationship to reality? Where do ideas come from? So, in summary, yes, parallel lines in our mind never cross, and yes, they seem not to exist in reality. But there is a very real connection between the idea and the "real" thing, but since we can only "see" the "idea" we can not now in "reality".