The ruler placement postulate is the third postulate in a set of principles (postulates, axioms) adapted for use in high schools concerning plane geometry (Euclidean Geometry).
postulates cannot be proved, they are the base of geometry and there isn't anything to prove it with. if the postulates were wrong then all of euclidian geometry would be wrong. that is like saying how do we know the English language is correct, it is the basis for communication and if it wasn't, then how would speaking the language work?
No. Postulates are the foundations of geometry. If you said they were wrong then it would be saying that Euclidean geometry is wrong. It is like if you asked how do we know that English is right. It is how the English language works. So no postulates do not need to be proven.
The difference between regular geometry and solid geometry is that regular geometry deals with angles, measuring angles, and theorem/postulates. Solid geometry deals with shapes and multiple sided figures.
investigation about definitions of postulates and theorem and property
The ruler placement postulate is the third postulate in a set of principles (postulates, axioms) adapted for use in high schools concerning plane geometry (Euclidean Geometry).
dkjdf
postulates
logic postulates theorems
postulates
postulates cannot be proved, they are the base of geometry and there isn't anything to prove it with. if the postulates were wrong then all of euclidian geometry would be wrong. that is like saying how do we know the English language is correct, it is the basis for communication and if it wasn't, then how would speaking the language work?
No. Postulates are the foundations of geometry. If you said they were wrong then it would be saying that Euclidean geometry is wrong. It is like if you asked how do we know that English is right. It is how the English language works. So no postulates do not need to be proven.
No. Postulates are the foundations of geometry. If you said they were wrong then it would be saying that Euclidean geometry is wrong. It is like if you asked how do we know that English is right. It is how the English language works. So no postulates do not need to be proven.
The axioms are not postulates.
The difference between regular geometry and solid geometry is that regular geometry deals with angles, measuring angles, and theorem/postulates. Solid geometry deals with shapes and multiple sided figures.
investigation about definitions of postulates and theorem and property
false