True, it is divisible by 1, 2, 4, 8, 349, 698, 1396, 2792
True. A number that is divisible by both 3 and 4 is also divisible by their least common multiple, which is 12. Since 12 can be expressed as (3 \times 4), any number meeting the criteria of being divisible by both 3 and 4 will indeed be divisible by 12.
3924 is divisible by 3 as the digits added together 3+9+2+4=18 is divisible by 3
4 divides 4 (once), but 4 is not divisible by 8. ■
No. The reverse is true, but 12 is divisible by 4 and not by 8.
It is a statement which is true for some sums.
False. If it doesn't end with a 2, 4, 6, 8, or 0, then it's not divisible by 2.
True. A number that is divisible by both 3 and 4 is also divisible by their least common multiple, which is 12. Since 12 can be expressed as (3 \times 4), any number meeting the criteria of being divisible by both 3 and 4 will indeed be divisible by 12.
3924 is divisible by 3 as the digits added together 3+9+2+4=18 is divisible by 3
459 divisible by 4 is a false statement.
False. Consider 4, itself.
4 divides 4 (once), but 4 is not divisible by 8. ■
No. The reverse is true, but 12 is divisible by 4 and not by 8.
This statement is not always true. While it is true that if a number is divisible by 4, it is also divisible by 2, the reverse is not necessarily true. For example, the number 6 is divisible by 2 but not by 4. In general, being divisible by 2 is a necessary but not a sufficient condition for being divisible by 4.
true
4 is divisible by 2 but not by 6
It is a statement which is true for some sums.
is it true or false my guess is False