3924 is divisible by 3 as the digits added together 3+9+2+4=18 is divisible by 3
4 divides 4 (once), but 4 is not divisible by 8. ■
No. The reverse is true, but 12 is divisible by 4 and not by 8.
It is a statement which is true for some sums.
Being divisible by 4, means that it will also be divisible by 2, so that doesn't tell you anything about divisibility by 8. But if you divide the number by 2, and this quotient is divisible by 4, then yes the original number is divisible by 8.
False. If it doesn't end with a 2, 4, 6, 8, or 0, then it's not divisible by 2.
3924 is divisible by 3 as the digits added together 3+9+2+4=18 is divisible by 3
459 divisible by 4 is a false statement.
False. Consider 4, itself.
4 divides 4 (once), but 4 is not divisible by 8. ■
No. The reverse is true, but 12 is divisible by 4 and not by 8.
This statement is not always true. While it is true that if a number is divisible by 4, it is also divisible by 2, the reverse is not necessarily true. For example, the number 6 is divisible by 2 but not by 4. In general, being divisible by 2 is a necessary but not a sufficient condition for being divisible by 4.
true
4 is divisible by 2 but not by 6
It is a statement which is true for some sums.
is it true or false my guess is False
FALSE