False. The question consists of two parts: - a number is divisible by 6 if it is divisible by 3? False. It must also be divisible by 2. - a number is divisible by 6 only if it is divisible by 3? This is true but the false part makes the whole statement false.
If a number is even (divisible by 2) and divisible by 3, then it must also be divisible by 6.
yes
false
No, not necessarily. 121 is a palindrome number with 3 digits (odd) and is divisible by 11. So this satisfies the premise, but 101, 111, 131, etc are not divisible by 11.An example which satisfies the premise does not prove it true, but one which contradicts the premise is enough to prove it false.
False. The question consists of two parts: - a number is divisible by 6 if it is divisible by 3? False. It must also be divisible by 2. - a number is divisible by 6 only if it is divisible by 3? This is true but the false part makes the whole statement false.
If this is a T-F question, the answer is false. It is true that if a number is divisible by 6, it also divisible by 3. This is true because 6 is divisible by 3. However, the converse -- If a number is divisible by 3, it is divisible by 6, is false. A counterexample is 15. 15 is divisible by 3, but not by 6. It becomes clearer if you split the question into its two parts. A number is divisible by 6 if it is divisible by 3? False. It must also be divisible by 2. A number is divisible by 6 only if it is divisible by 3? True.
True. Since 615 ends in 5, it is divisible by 5. Since the sum 12, of the digits of 615, is divisible evenly by 3, 615 is divisible by 3.
How can the following definition be written correctly as a biconditional statement? An odd integer is an integer that is not divisible by two. (A+ answer) An integer is odd if and only if it is not divisible by two
It is! I took hours and hours of doing the stupid division so there you go! IT IS TRUE! NOT FALSE!
No, look at 5 it is odd and not divisible by 3. false,because if you look at the 5 it is not divisible by 3.
True fact.
Yes, it is true 558/3 = 186 To find out if a number is divisible by 3, add the digits; if the sum is divisible by 3, so is the number 5+5+8 = 18 which is divisible by 3
That is false. This type of statement is only true for prime numbers, not for compound numbers such as 6. Counterexample: 2 x 3 = 6
Yes. The sum of the digits is 18 which is divisible by 3.
If a number is even (divisible by 2) and divisible by 3, then it must also be divisible by 6.
yes