0
true
You can imagine any 3 dimensional shape as stacking the 2 dimensional version of that shape on top of each other.
Actually, it is false.
You can imagine a 3-d object being made up of a lot of 2-d objects stacked on top of one another. But remember that, by definition, a 2-d object has no thickness (or, in this case, height).
Height of one 2-d obect = 0
so height of n such objects = n*0 = 0
So a stack, no matter how many objects you use, will remain 0. And so you are not building up a 3-d object.
Alternatively, you could imagine a cube (3-d) being built up from 6 square faces (2-d). Except that this is just the shell of the 3-d object, not the 3-d object itself.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
A three dimensional object cannot be built from two dimensional objects?
That's more of a statement than a question. It's also a false statement. You can build a three dimensional object from two dimensional objects, if you have an infinite number of them.
How many 1970 440 roadrunners were built?
[object Object]
What is a replica of an original object that is too large or too small to be built at actual size?
a model
Is the area of stair hall included in the area of a floor?
not really because they are 2 diffrent objects floor and stair hall is only BUILT on the floor witch makes it no.
What is the Difference between built up area and floor area?
Built up area is the area which has been developed.and floor area is the area which is about to built or about to develope.
What is the smaller object that are built to represent the detail of larger objects?
The smaller objects which are built to represent the larger objects are called Model
What is a small object usually built to scale that represents in detail another often larger object?
The smaller objects which are built to represent the larger objects are called Model
A three-dimensional object cannot be built from two-dimensional objects.?
false
Sorting an array of objects through in built function?
Object[] arrayToBeSorted; Arrays.sort(arrayToBeSorted);
Does distance change an objects built in gravity?
No, an object's built-in gravity is determined by its mass, not its distance. Gravity depends on the mass of the object causing the gravitational pull, not on the distance between the object and the affected object.
A three dimensional object cannot be built from two dimensional objects?
That's more of a statement than a question. It's also a false statement. You can build a three dimensional object from two dimensional objects, if you have an infinite number of them.
What are three ways static charge can be built up?
Static charge can be built up through friction between two objects, by induction where a charged object is brought near a neutral object causing the charges to separate, or by contact where a charged object transfers electrons to a neutral object when they come in contact.
What are direct objects indirect objects predicate nominatives predicate adjectives?
Direct objects receive the action of the verb.Carl built a house. (a house is the direct object)Indirect objects receive the direct object.Martha handed me her hat. (her hat is the direct object; me is the indirect object)Predicate nominatives and predicate adjectives follow a linking verb and rename or describe the subject.Carl is a carpenter. (a carpenter is the predicate nominative)Martha is happy. (happy is the predicate adjective)
Can a three-dimensional object may be built from two-dimensional objects?
Not really. You can imagine a 3-d object being made up of a lot of 2-d objects stacked on top of one another. But remember that, by definition, a 2-d object has no thickness (or, in this case, height). Height of one 2-d obect = 0 so height of n such objects = n*0 = 0 So a stack, no matter how many objects you use, will remain 0. And so you are not building up a 3-d object. Alternatively, you could imagine a cube (3-d) being built up from 6 square faces (2-d). Except that this is just the shell of the 3-d object, not the 3-d object itself.
An object built by ancient culture but which cannot be moved is called?
An object bult by an ancient culter vut which cannot be moved be is called a feature A+
A three-dimensional object cannot be built from two-dimensional objects?
false Actually, the statement is true. You can imagine a 3-d object being made up of a lot of 2-d objects stacked on top of one another. But remember that, by definition, a 2-d object has no thickness (or, in this case, height). Height of one 2-d obect = 0 so height of n such objects = n*0 = 0 So a stack, no matter how many objects you use, will remain 0. And so you are not building up a 3-d object. Alternatively, you could imagine a cube (3-d) being built up from 6 square faces (2-d). Except that this is just the shell of the 3-d object, not the 3-d object itself.
What subatomic particles move from the surface of objects when friction occurs?
Electrons. That is how static charge is built. Some of the electrons of one object move to the other, creating a negative charge where the electrons have built up, and a positive charge where the electrons have vacated.
