Without seeing the graph, I can't provide a specific answer regarding the size of antlers for an elk with a 470 mm long skull. Generally, antler size is correlated with skull length; typically, longer skulls may indicate larger antlers. If the graph shows a trend or relationship between skull length and antler size, you could estimate the expected size based on that trend.
??? how do you expect me to answer that?? ???
It's difficult to make out enough detail to formulate an answer. Not only can't I see the numbers below the graph, I can't even see the graph.
Then that part of the graph is below the x-axis.
I'm sorry, but I cannot view images or graphs. However, if you describe the key features or trends of the graph, I can help you analyze it and provide a likely explanation for the changes observed halfway through Year 15.
A graph has two axes, X and Y. A function can be seen on the graph based on the formula with X and Y representing certain properties in the formula.
335 mm A+
??? how do you expect me to answer that?? ???
It's difficult to make out enough detail to formulate an answer. Not only can't I see the numbers below the graph, I can't even see the graph.
Click on the 'Bar Graph' link below to see what a bar graph looks like.
Then that part of the graph is below the x-axis.
colume
You find the main idea of the graph then make the title based on that.
D
a comparison of two variables
That's not correct. If you have a graph of distance as a function of time, the speed is the slope of the graph.
False. It may be simple to calculate percentages from one but that need not be what the graph is based on.
The position versus time graph is parabolic.