Best Answer

These number can also be represented on real line.

Study guides

☆☆

Q: Can irrational numbers cannot be represented by points on the real number line?

Write your answer...

Submit

Still have questions?

Continue Learning about Math & Arithmetic

No, -5 is not an irrational number. Irrational numbers are numbers that cannot be represented as the quotient of two integers. Since -5 is already an integer, it is rational.

Irrational numbers are precisely those real numbers that cannot be represented as terminating or repeating decimals. Log 216 = 2.334453751 terminates and is therefore not irrational.

There are no irrational numbers in the value -5.72. All of the components of the value are represented by rational numbers. An irrational number is any number that cannot be represented by a fraction a/b where a and b are integers. -5.72 itself is rational as it can be represented by -572 / 100. The digits of the value are also rational as they can be represented as -5/1, 7/1 and 2/1, respectively.

In mathematics, an irrational number is any real number that cannot be expressed as a ratio of integers. Irrational numbers cannot be represented as terminating or repeating decimals.The square root of 31 is one such.

No. Whole numbers cannot be irrational.

Related questions

No. Irrational numbers are those that cannot be represented as a fractions. Any number which repeats could be represented as a fraction.

Rational numbers can be represented in the form x/y but irrational numbers cannot.

No, -5 is not an irrational number. Irrational numbers are numbers that cannot be represented as the quotient of two integers. Since -5 is already an integer, it is rational.

Irrational numbers are precisely those real numbers that cannot be represented as terminating or repeating decimals. Log 216 = 2.334453751 terminates and is therefore not irrational.

There are no irrational numbers in the value -5.72. All of the components of the value are represented by rational numbers. An irrational number is any number that cannot be represented by a fraction a/b where a and b are integers. -5.72 itself is rational as it can be represented by -572 / 100. The digits of the value are also rational as they can be represented as -5/1, 7/1 and 2/1, respectively.

Irrational numbers are real numbers.

No - the sets of rational and irrational numbers have no intersection. A rational number is any Real number that CAN be represented as a ratio of two integers where the denominator is not zero. An Irrational number is any Real number the CANNOT be represented as a ration of two integers.

An irrational number is a number that cannot be represented as a fraction involving two integers. A transcendental number is a number that cannot be repesented as a polynomial with rational coefficients. Two notable transcendental numbers are pi and e.

In mathematics, an irrational number is any real number that cannot be expressed as a ratio of integers. Irrational numbers cannot be represented as terminating or repeating decimals.The square root of 31 is one such.

No. Whole numbers cannot be irrational.

An irrational number is a number that can't be exactly represented as the ratio of two integers.

No integer is an irrational number. An irrational number is a number that cannot be represented as an integer or a fraction.All integers which are whole numbers are rational numbers.

People also asked

Featured Questions