Consider a square with a smaller square inside of it, where each of the corners of the smaller square touch the midpoints of the sides of the larger square. ( I would suggest drawing a picture of this. I tried to post one, but I can't for WikiAnswers) There are 4 congruent right triangles formed from this picture. There are two legs to these triangles, of length a and b. The hypotenuse of each of these triangles will be called c. Let us add up one side of the big square. This quantity is (a+b). Let us square this, so the area of the big square is (a+b)2. Thus the area of the big square is a2 + 2ab + b2. We can now subtract the area of the smaller circle which is c2. So we now have a2 + 2ab + b2-c2. We now need to subtract the 4 congruent triangles. The area of a triangle is one half the base times height. In this case, one triangle is .5ab. Multiply this by 4, and we have 2ab. Now we have the entire expression a2 + 2ab + b2-c2 - 2ab = 0, since we have taken the full area of the square, and subtracted out all of the individual parts. The 2ab and the -2ab add up to zero, so we now have a2 + b2-c2 = 0. We can add the -c2 to the other side, thus giving us a2 + b2 = c2 This is one of the many ways to prove the Pythagorean Theorem.
Yes, the corollary to one theorem can be used to prove another theorem.
You cannot solve a theorem: you can prove the theorem or you can solve a question based on the remainder theorem.
asa theorem
A theorem to prove. A series of logical statements. A series of reasons for the statements. answer theorem to prove
A segment need not be a bisector. No theorem can be used to prove something that may not be true!
Yes, the corollary to one theorem can be used to prove another theorem.
Theorem 8.11 in what book?
Well, this will depend on the length of the sides of the triangle for what postulate or theorem you will be using.
You cannot solve a theorem: you can prove the theorem or you can solve a question based on the remainder theorem.
asa theorem
A theorem to prove. A series of logical statements. A series of reasons for the statements. answer theorem to prove
A segment need not be a bisector. No theorem can be used to prove something that may not be true!
HL congruence theorem
I will give a link that explains and proves the theorem.
Q.e.d.
I have to prove http://s5.tinypic.com/19ldma.jpg http://img22.imageshack.us/img22/9263/mathhlproofou4.jpg without using pythagorean theorem
..?