Best Answer

Yes they did and it looked like the letter N and its Latin name is "nullae" meaning nothing.

Unlike the Hindu-Arabic numeral system the Roman numeral system does not need a zero figure for positional place value purposes because the place value of theses numerals are self evident.

For example in Roman numerals DCVI is obviously 606 but in the Hindu-Arabic system a nought figure is needed to distinguish 66 from 606.

Q: Did the Romans have a symbol for zero?

Write your answer...

Submit

Still have questions?

Continue Learning about Math & Arithmetic

Yes the Romans had a symbol for zero which was N but there was no need to use it because the positional place value of Roman numerals are self explanatory. For example to write out 501 we need to include a zero to represent its real value but the equivalent of 501 in Roman numerals is DI which does not require a zero symbol.

It can't be represented by any symbol.Another Answer:-The symbol for zero as a Roman numeral is N but it is never needed because the positional place value of Roman numerals are self evident.

The number zero is needed in the Hindu-Arabic numeral system because as for example it tells us that there is a difference between 207 and 27 but in the Roman numeral system a zero number is not needed because we automatically know that there is a difference between CCVII and XXVII. In fact the Romans had a symbol for zero which was N and its Latin word is 'nihil'

The Romans did not have a symbol for 0. We use it to mulitpy a number by 10, 100, 1000 etc but the Romans had specific numerals for these values, X, C and M, they did not tack a zero onto the end of numbers. Apparently the symbol N for Nullae (nothing) was used in later times by monks, to express a value of zero when they were writing in Roman numerals.

The Romans had no symbol for the value zero (0) because they did not need one in their system. However during the middle ages monks, who still used Latin and Roman numerals, introduced the symbol N (from the Latin Nullae, meaning nothing) to represent zero.

Related questions

Yes the Romans had a symbol for zero which was N but there was no need to use it because the positional place value of Roman numerals are self explanatory. For example to write out 501 we need to include a zero to represent its real value but the equivalent of 501 in Roman numerals is DI which does not require a zero symbol.

Yes the Romans had a symbol for zero which was N but it wasn't needed in their numeral system because the positional place value of the numerals are self evident.

It can't be represented by any symbol.Another Answer:-The symbol for zero as a Roman numeral is N but it is never needed because the positional place value of Roman numerals are self evident.

The Romans had no symbol for zero but medieval monks, writing in Latin introduced the symbol N to represent the Latin word Nullae (meaning nothing).

Yes the Romans did have a symbol for zero and it looked like the letter N but they didn't need it in their numeral system for positional place value purposes because the positional place value of Roman numerals are self evident.

The number zero is needed in the Hindu-Arabic numeral system because as for example it tells us that there is a difference between 207 and 27 but in the Roman numeral system a zero number is not needed because we automatically know that there is a difference between CCVII and XXVII. In fact the Romans had a symbol for zero which was N and its Latin word is 'nihil'

The number zero is needed in the Hindu-Arabic numeral system because as for example it tells us that there is a difference between 207 and 27 but in the Roman numeral system a zero number is not needed because we automatically know that there is a difference between CCVII and XXVII. In fact the Romans had a symbol for zero which was N and its Latin word is 'nihil'

The Romans did not have a symbol for 0. We use it to mulitpy a number by 10, 100, 1000 etc but the Romans had specific numerals for these values, X, C and M, they did not tack a zero onto the end of numbers. Apparently the symbol N for Nullae (nothing) was used in later times by monks, to express a value of zero when they were writing in Roman numerals.

The Roman numeracy system lacked a zero symbol which was not needed because the positional place values of its numerals were self evident.

The Romans had no symbol for the value zero (0) because they did not need one in their system. However during the middle ages monks, who still used Latin and Roman numerals, introduced the symbol N (from the Latin Nullae, meaning nothing) to represent zero.

Because the Hindu-Arabic numeral system contains a zero symbol for positional place value purposes making calculations a a lot easier whereas the Roman numeral system does not have a zero symbol in it thus leading to confusion when calculating.

The Romans had no numeral for zero. But later, during the middle ages, monks who still wrote in Latin and used Roman numerals introduced the symbol N (representing the Latin word Nullae) for zero.