0
What else can I help you with?
Why is the snorg hypothesis not scientific?
There is no experiment or possible evidence that could prove that invisible snorgs do not exist. So the Snorg Hypothesis is not scientific. On the other hand, the "Negative Snorg Hypothesis" (that they do not exist) is scientific. You can disprove it by catching one.
Explain in detail the three possible outcomes that may result from this research?
The question is very poorly specified so this answer is simply a wild guess at what the questioner might want. Three possible outcomes of any research, designed to test some hypothesis, are: (a) evidence in support of the hypothesis; (b) evidence disproving the hypothesis; or (c) evidence that can neither prove (support) nor disprove the hypothesis.
What do you call the process of rejecting null hypothesis?
The process is called hypothesis testing. If you are inquiring on how to prove or disprove a claim, search for the article on wikipedia.
What is Hypothesis of a researcher?
The researcher's working theory of what s/he expects the research either to prove or disprove.
What is the connection between hypotheses and the tests that are conducted in an investigation?
They are part of the scientific method. The test results confirm or disprove the hypothesis.
What are two possible outcomes to prove an experiments hypothesis?
To prove the hypothesis. To disprove the hypothesis.
What if your hypothesis is correct?
Your hypothesis is supported by the data. You cannot prove a hypothesis because somebody may do some other experiments and disprove it eventually. You can only disprove a hypothesis or indicate that it is supported by the data.
How is a hypothesis is tested?
conducting experiment
Why is the snorg hypothesis not scientific?
There is no experiment or possible evidence that could prove that invisible snorgs do not exist. So the Snorg Hypothesis is not scientific. On the other hand, the "Negative Snorg Hypothesis" (that they do not exist) is scientific. You can disprove it by catching one.
In order to prove or disprove your hypothesis you must?
be testable
What can experiments prove?
An experiment can prove or disprove a hypothesis.
What do scientists do if they disprove their hypothesis?
they become nerds and never get married
How did your experiment prove or disprove the hypothesis?
That depends on the result of the experiment. The experiment is a way to test a hypothesis, and it's completely fine if the experiment disproves the hypothesis. Ideally, though, the experiment will support the hypothesis.
Is it possible to prove a hypothesis by conducting rigorously controlled experiments?
Rigorously controlled experiments can provide evidence to support or refute a hypothesis, but they cannot definitively prove a hypothesis. Scientific hypotheses are continually evaluated, refined, and occasionally rejected based on new evidence and further experimentation.
Explain in detail the three possible outcomes that may result from this research?
The question is very poorly specified so this answer is simply a wild guess at what the questioner might want. Three possible outcomes of any research, designed to test some hypothesis, are: (a) evidence in support of the hypothesis; (b) evidence disproving the hypothesis; or (c) evidence that can neither prove (support) nor disprove the hypothesis.
What does it mean if a scientist can't reject a hypothesis?
It means that she or he has to accept that the existing hypothesis appears to be true.
A good scientist looks for a way to?
not only to prove a hypothesis, but disprove it as well
