Rejecting a true null hypothesis.
Yes, usually.
An alpha error is another name in statistics for a type I error, rejecting the null hypothesis when the null hypothesis is true.
No. Rejecting the Null Hypothesis means that there is a high degree of probability that it is not correct. This degree of probability is the critical level that you choose for the test statistic. However, there is still a small probability that the null hypothesis was correct.
Rejecting a true null hypothesis.
Rejecting a true null hypothesis.
Increasing alpha from .01 to .05 will increase the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is true.
Yes, usually.
Rejecting null hypothesis means that rumour of a fact is been experimented in d lab and the reseacher later discovered that hypothesis pseudo i.e fack fact but not a theory
sample size
An alpha error is another name in statistics for a type I error, rejecting the null hypothesis when the null hypothesis is true.
The null hypothesis will not reject - it is a hypothesis and is not capable of rejecting anything. The critical region consists of the values of the test statistic where YOU will reject the null hypothesis in favour of the expressed alternative hypothesis.
No. Rejecting the Null Hypothesis means that there is a high degree of probability that it is not correct. This degree of probability is the critical level that you choose for the test statistic. However, there is still a small probability that the null hypothesis was correct.
Rejecting a true null hypothesis.
This will reduce the type 1 error. Since type 1 error is rejecting the null hypothesis when it is true, decreasing alpha (or p value) decreases the risk of rejecting the null hypothesis.
I believe you have to design a null hypothesis that is very precise in order to avoid false positives ( rejecting the null hypothesis when it is actually true). Tricky question though!
Probability of rejecting a true null hypothesis; that is, the alpha value or risk you are willing to take probabilistically speaking.