no the equation is not correct, the only way it would be correct is if x=7 which would be a commutative property
It is not the distributive property. The statement in the question is simply FALSE.
no; commutative
No, the equation m + n = n + m does not represent the distributive property. The distributive property is typically written as a(b + c) = ab + ac, where a, b, and c are numbers. It describes the relationship between multiplication and addition. The equation m + n = n + m is known as the commutative property of addition, which states that the order of addition does not affect the sum.
There is no particular property illustrated by the equation shown.
0.4*(7.5 + 40) = 19
6(2 + 1) = 18==========
no the equation is not correct, the only way it would be correct is if x=7 which would be a commutative property
It is not the distributive property. The statement in the question is simply FALSE.
The distributive property need not have any k in it.
no; commutative
2(x + 3) = 18 or did you mean that solution would be x = 18? then 2(x + 3) = 42
No, the equation m + n = n + m does not represent the distributive property. The distributive property is typically written as a(b + c) = ab + ac, where a, b, and c are numbers. It describes the relationship between multiplication and addition. The equation m + n = n + m is known as the commutative property of addition, which states that the order of addition does not affect the sum.
distributive
The commutative property
The distributive property of multiplication over addition and the identity property of multiplication. RS + RS = 1*RS + 1*RS (using identity property) = (1 + 1)*RS (using distributive property) = 2*RS
The property is: If equals are subtracted from equals, the results are equal.