A quadratic equation can have a maximum of 2 solutions. If the discriminant (b2-4ac) turns out to be less than 0, the equation will have no real roots. If the Discriminant is equal to 0, it will have equal roots. But, if the discriminant turns out to be more than 0,then the equation will have unequal and real roots.
Without an equality sign the given quadratic expression can't be classed as an equation but knowing how to use the quadratic equation formula would be helpful when given such problems.
The given expression is a quadratic equation. To find its solutions, we can either factor the equation or use the quadratic formula. However, without an equation to solve or any context, it is not possible to provide a numeric answer.
An equation just has an equal sign. A function is basically just an equation without one!
There are 5 existing methods in solving quadratic equations. For the first 4 methods (quadratic formula, factoring, graphing, completing the square) you can easily find them in algebra books. I would like to explain here the new one, the Diagonal Sum Method, recently presented in book titled:"New methods for solving quadratic equations and inequalities" (Trafford 2009). It directly gives the 2 roots in the form of 2 fractions, without having to factor the equation. The innovative concept of the method is finding 2 fractions knowing their Sum (-b/a) and their Product (c/a). It is very fast, convenient and is applicable whenever the given quadratic equation is factorable. In general, it is hard to tell in advance if a given quadratic equation can be factored. However, if this new method fails to find the answer, then we can conclude that the equation can not be factored, and consequently, the quadratic formula must be used. This new method can replace the trial-and-error factoring method since it is faster, more convenient, with fewer permutations and fewer trials.
Without an equality sign the given terms can't be considered to be a quadratic equation.
Without an equality sign the given expression can't be considered to be an equation but if it equals 0 then using the quadratic equation formula will give its solutions.
Without an equality sign the given quadratic expression can't be classed as an equation but knowing how to use the quadratic equation formula would be helpful when given such problems.
In general, there are two steps in solving a given quadratic equation in standard form ax^2 + bx + c = 0. If a = 1, the process is much simpler. The first step is making sure that the equation can be factored? How? In general, it is hard to know in advance if a quadratic equation is factorable. I suggest that you use first the new Diagonal Sum Method to solve the equation. It is fast and convenient and can directly give the 2 roots in the form of 2 fractions. without having to factor the equation. If this method fails, then you can conclude that the equation is not factorable, and consequently, the quadratic formula must be used. See book titled:" New methods for solving quadratic equations and inequalities" (Trafford Publishing 2009) The second step is solving the equation by the quadratic formula. This book also introduces a new improved quadratic formula, that is easier to remember by relating the formula to the x-intercepts with the parabola graph of the quadratic function.
Without an equality sign and not knowing the plus or minus value of 11 it can't be considered to be an equation.
The given expression is a quadratic equation. To find its solutions, we can either factor the equation or use the quadratic formula. However, without an equation to solve or any context, it is not possible to provide a numeric answer.
An equation just has an equal sign. A function is basically just an equation without one!
It really depends on the type of equation. Sometimes you can know, from experience with similar equations. But in many cases, you have to actually do the work of trying to solve the equation.
Without an equality sign and no square variable the given terms can not be that of a quadratic equation.
With a negative discriminant, the two solutions are imaginary.
Without an equality sign it can't be an equation but some kind of algebraic expression
using the quadratic formula or the graphics calculator. Yes, you can do it another way, by using a new method, called Diagonal Sum Method, that can quickly and directly give the 2 roots, without having to factor the equation. This method is fast, convenient and is applicable to any quadratic equation in standard form ax^2 +bx + c = 0, whenever it can be factored. It requires fewer permutations than the factoring method does, especially when the constants a, b, and c are large numbers. If this method fails to get answer, then consequently, the quadratic formula must be used to solve the given equation. It is a trial-and-error method, same as the factoring method, that usually takes fewer than 3 trials to solve any quadratic equation. See book titled:" New methods for solving quadratic equations and inequalities" (Trafford Publishing 2009)
There is a new method, called Diagonal Sum Method, that quickly and directly give the 2 roots without having to factor the equation. The innovative concept of this method is finding 2 fractions knowing their sum (-b/a) and their product (c/a). It is fast, convenient and is applicable to any quadratic equation in standard form ax^2 + bx + c = 0, whenever it can be factored. If it fails to find answer, then the equation is not factorable, and consequently, the quadratic formula must be used. So, I advise you to proceed solving any quadratic equation in 2 steps. First, find out if the equation can be factored? How?. Use this new method to solve it. It usually takes fewer than 3 trials. If its fails then use the quadratic formula to solve it in the second step. See book titled:" New methods for solving quadratic equations and inequalities" (Trafford Publishing 2009)