30.610 = 36.4631...8 (with the 4631 recurring).
I converted it by separating it into 30 + 0.6.
The 30 I converted by the usual method of dividing by the new base to get a quotient and remainder; then dividing the quotient by the base and repeating until the quotient is zero and the remainders in reverse order are the whole number in the new base.
The 0.6 I converted by seeing how many 1/8s are in 0.6, which gives the first digit after the octal point. Subtracting this, from 0.6 then left me with finding how many 1/82 = 1/64s are in the remainder to give the next digit after the octal point and so on. This I actually did by dividing 0.6 by 1/8 which is the same as multiplying it by 8 which gives a whole number (the next digit after the octal point) and a decimal part; I then repeated by multiplying the decimal part by 8 and so on:
30 ÷ 8 = 3 r 6
3 ÷ 8 = 0 r 3
⇒ 3010 = 368
0.6 x 8 = 4 + 0.8
0.8 x 8 = 6 + 0.4
0.4 x 8 = 3 + 0.2
0.2 x 8 = 1 + 0.6
at which point the digits repeat giving the answer as 30.610 = 36.4631...8
Octal: 56704534 Decimal: 12290396
NA
1D.12516
That can't be an octal number; it has an 8 in it.
yes its octal form is (101)to the base 8.
Don't. 889 is not an octal number.
(83)base10 to octal
480
Octal = 52746757 Binary = 101010111100110111101111
Octal: 56704534 Decimal: 12290396
A45C: Decimal = 42076 Octal = 122134
BB895C: Octal = 56704534 Decimal = 12290396
F5B6D3 = 75333323
fdfd
134.105
56704534
C65A = 143132