Other than the Quadratic Formula, there are two ways to solve a quadratic with a coefficient of more than 1 in the x2 term.
First, you can divide all terms by a common multiple if they have one, e.g.
2x2 + 10x + 12 can be divided by 2 to get x2 + 5x + 6, which factorises easily. If this doesn't work, then it's fine to skip straight to harder factorising.
First, multiply the final term by the coefficient of the x2 term.
e.g. for 3x2 + 4x - 7, multiply the -7 by the 3 to get -21.
Next, find which two numbers will multiply to get -21 and add to get 4, in this case 7 and -3.
Then, arrange the equation like this: (3x2 -3x) + (7x -7) , with the x coefficients matching up to the easiest number to divide by (this equation is easy, 3 matches with -3 and 7 matches with -7).
Factorise: 3x(x-1) +7(x-1)
Simplify: (3x+7)(x-1) Complete. Hope this helps.
Chat with our AI personalities
No because quadratic equations only have 2 X-Intercepts
This is a quadratic equation requiring the values of x to be found. Rearrange the equation in the form of: -3x2-4x+6 = 0 Use the quadratic equation formula to factorise the equation: (-3x+2.69041576)(x+2.23013857) Therefore the values of x are 0.8968052533 or - 2.230138587 An even more accurate answer can be found by using surds instead of decimals.
we study linear equation in other to know more about quadratic equation
It really depends what you work in; if you work in science, or in engineering (applied science), you will need the quadratic equation - and a lot more advanced math as well. Examples that involve the quadratic equation are found in abundance in algebra textbooks; for example, an object in free fall.
It is not always better.Although quadratic equations always have solutions in the complex system, complex solutions might not always make any sense. In such circumstances, sticking to the real number system makes more sense that trying to evaluate an impossible solution in the complex field.