The term that best describes a proof in which you assume the opposite of what you want to prove is 'indirect proof'.
proof by contradiction
if EB=EC and AB=DC prove <A=<D
What have we got to prove? Whether we have to prove a triangle as an Isoseles triangle or prove a property of an isoseles triangle. Hey, do u go to ALHS, i had that same problem on my test today. Greenehornet15@yahoo.com
prove- show someone that you can do it, or show someone somthing that they dont believe.
By giving evidence.
You do not have to prove you are nota witch. Others have to prove that you are a witch. Even if you are a witch, or Wicca, there is nothing wrong with that (in the US).
No but others have.
That would be referred to as an ALIBI, and you would approach the accused's attorney as to how to offer your assistance in their case.
If you feel that you need to prove that a pic is not of you, there are a few options. For example, you may take a picture of yourself and your screenname and post it online to prove it to others.
The reason people debate is to prove the point they are trying to prove. They are supporting an idea and want others to support it as well.
The best way to prove employee dishonesty is by keeping a record of evidence that may prove your view. Without evidence or a witness, it may be difficult to prove it.
Have faith in yourself and sometimes realising the ignorance of others.
to prove to others that everything is possible
The term that best describes a proof in which you assume the opposite of what you want to prove is 'indirect proof'.
By experiment.
No. Any person trained in logic will tell you that 'you cannot prove a negative'. If you want to disprove the existence of fairies you first attempt to try and prove their existence. And the best you can do is to fail to prove it. The option to prove it always exists.