The two consecutive integers whose sum is 73 are 36 and 37.
There are two consecutive odd integers whose sum is 176. They are 87 and 89.
The smallest of seven consecutive even integers whose sum is 700 is 94.
3 consecutive even integers whose sum is 396 are 130, 132 and 134.
They are odd consecutive integers: 21, 23, 25 and 27.
Find two consecuitive integers whose sum is 89. To solve this problem, let x be the smaller of these integers. What is the larger of these two consecutive integers? In terms of x, write a formula that represents the sum of these two consecutive integers.
The consecutive integers whose sum is 51 are 16, 17, and 18.
The two consecutive integers whose sum is 73 are 36 and 37.
Find 2 consecutive ODD integers whose sum is -88 ANSWER: -45, -43
There are no two consecutive integers whose product is 421 - the product of 20 and 21 is 420.
There are two consecutive odd integers whose sum is 176. They are 87 and 89.
no solution. If you solve for x (where x is the first integer) the answer is a fraction, which is not an integer.
There is no set of three consecutive integers whose sum is 71.
The smallest of seven consecutive even integers whose sum is 700 is 94.
3 consecutive even integers whose sum is 396 are 130, 132 and 134.
That isn't possible; three consecutive integers, or three consecutive positive integers, always have a sum that is a multiple of 3. In general, you can solve this quickly by trial and error. In this case, you will quickly find that a certain set of three consecutive integers will give you a sum that is TOO LOW, while the next-higher even integers will give you a sum that is TOO HIGH. You can also write an equation and solve it: n + (n + 2) + (n + 4) = 32. If you solve it, you will find that the solution is fractional, not integral.
The two even consecutive integers are: 62+64 = 126