0
What else can I help you with?
How would a list of factors pairs relate to the rectangles that could be made to show the number?
As I understand it, the number of factor pairs is equal to the number of rectangles.
How are the dimensions of the rectangles for a given number of square tiles related to factor pairs?
The number of square tiles is always equal to factor pairs. As an example, imagine a rectangle that contains 8 squares - 2 rows of 4. 2 X 4 = 8. In other words, the dimensions of the rectangles are ALWAYS equal to a factor pair of the number of squares in the rectangle. A rectangle containing 24 squares could be made as 24x1, 12x2, 8x3, or 6x4.
Why is it possible to draw more than two different rectangles with an area of 36 units?
This is because 36 is a composite number.A prime number, p, has only the factorisation 1*p and so that is the only rectangle possible. But for a composite number there is at least one other factor q which may have a factor pair q' such that q*q' = p. q and q' could be the same if the number p was the square of q.So then you have rectangles of size 1*p and q*q'.
A two-digit number is a factor of 100 what could the number be?
50
Could a parallelogram that is not a rectangle darw it?
Here's something to think about: -- Every rectangle is a parallelogram. There are an infinite number of them. -- There are also an infinite number of more parallelograms that are not rectangles.
How is the list of factor pairs related to the rectangles that could be made to show 588?
Number of factor pairs = number of rectangles
How would a list of factors pairs relate to the rectangles that could be made to show the number?
As I understand it, the number of factor pairs is equal to the number of rectangles.
How are the dimensions of the rectangles for a given number of square tiles related to factor pairs of the number?
The number of square tiles is always equal to factor pairs. As an example, imagine a rectangle that contains 8 squares - 2 rows of 4. 2 X 4 = 8. In other words, the dimensions of the rectangles are ALWAYS equal to a factor pair of the number of squares in the rectangle. A rectangle containing 24 squares could be made as 24x1, 12x2, 8x3, or 6x4.
How are the dimensions of the rectangles for a given number of square tiles related to factor pairs?
The number of square tiles is always equal to factor pairs. As an example, imagine a rectangle that contains 8 squares - 2 rows of 4. 2 X 4 = 8. In other words, the dimensions of the rectangles are ALWAYS equal to a factor pair of the number of squares in the rectangle. A rectangle containing 24 squares could be made as 24x1, 12x2, 8x3, or 6x4.
How many rectangles are in a rectangle?
There are an infinite number of rectangles for any given area, while there is only one square for any given area. The number of integer-value rectangles depends on the area and the number of integer factors of a whole-number area. Example: a rectangular area of 6 square inches could be enclosed by rectangles that were 1x6, 2x3, 3x2, and 6x1. Non-integer dimensions would include 1.5x4 and 1.2x5 inches.
How many rectangles could you make with 10 squares?
You could make 5 rectangles with 10 squares
What rectangles can the band director make by arranging the band members?
The band director can create rectangles by arranging band members in rows and columns, where the total number of members equals the area of the rectangle. For example, if there are 24 members, possible rectangles could include configurations of 1x24, 2x12, 3x8, or 4x6. The dimensions of the rectangles must be factors of the total number of members, ensuring that each row has an equal number of members. Thus, the specific rectangles depend on the total number of band members available.
What is the least factor that a number could have?
The number one.
Could a number have a factor greater then the number itself?
yes i think it could
Why is it possible to draw more than two different rectangles with an area of 36 units?
This is because 36 is a composite number.A prime number, p, has only the factorisation 1*p and so that is the only rectangle possible. But for a composite number there is at least one other factor q which may have a factor pair q' such that q*q' = p. q and q' could be the same if the number p was the square of q.So then you have rectangles of size 1*p and q*q'.
A two-digit number is a factor of 100 what could the number be?
50
Could a parallelogram that is not a rectangle darw it?
Here's something to think about: -- Every rectangle is a parallelogram. There are an infinite number of them. -- There are also an infinite number of more parallelograms that are not rectangles.
