answersLogoWhite

0

Eight 4 inch cubes are needed to build and 8 inch cube.

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Can you build a pyramid out of cubes and would the sides be smooth?

no


How many cubes would you need to build a stack the was 3 cubes long 2 cubes high and 4 cubes deep?

24 cubes would be it.


How many 1 in cubes would be needed to build a 4in cubes?

64


Draw a cube of side 6cm.how many cubes of side 2cm would it take to fill it?

It would take 27 cubes with sides of 2cm.


How many cubes would it take to build the 149th arrangement?

346


How many larger cubes can you make when you have 100 centimetre cubes?

To determine the number of larger cubes that can be made, we need to find the largest perfect cube that is less than or equal to 100. The largest cube that fits this criteria is 64 (4^3). Therefore, you can make 64 larger cubes when you have 100 centimeter cubes.


How many cubes would you need to build a stack that was 3 cubes long 2 cubes high and 4 cubes deep?

Well, isn't that just a delightful little stack of cubes you're imagining! To build a stack that is 3 cubes long, 2 cubes high, and 4 cubes deep, you would need a total of 24 cubes. Just imagine all the happy little details you could add to each cube as you stack them up!


How many cubes would it take to build a rectangular solid that is 2 units by 2 units by 2 units?

2*2*2 = 8 cubes.


Can a cube tesselate?

Sure cubes can tessellate. It's actually very easy to do so with cubes, as they would all have straight sides of even lengths from any angle.


How many cubes would it take to build the 23rd arrangement in this sequence?

67 i think maybe please answer it for me


Why do you have use rectangular prisms insted of cubes to build a house?

It would be very slow going and the walls would be very thick.


How many sides of small cubes can be seen if eight identical cubes are arranged into one large cube on a table?

24, unless you aren't counting the ones on the bottom (which would be obscured by the table), in which case it would be 20.