346
A good arrengenent would be ,Three rows of three. Or 3*3=9 cubic units.
The sequence appears to be alternating between cubes of integers and their negative counterparts. The first number is -4 cubed, the second is 5 cubed, the third is -6 cubed, the fourth is 7 cubed, and the fifth is -8 cubed. Therefore, the next number in the sequence would be 8 cubed, which is 512.
You would be adding volumes together; whatever configuration you put them would be irrelevant then. Assuming these are all 1" cubes, you would have first a long row of 8 (1"x1"x8" total) or a cube made of cubes (2"x2"x2" total) and they both come to 8 cubic inches.
Eight half inch cubes would fill a one inch cube.
346
24 cubes would be it.
64
no
Eight 4 inch cubes are needed to build and 8 inch cube.
Well, isn't that just a delightful little stack of cubes you're imagining! To build a stack that is 3 cubes long, 2 cubes high, and 4 cubes deep, you would need a total of 24 cubes. Just imagine all the happy little details you could add to each cube as you stack them up!
2*2*2 = 8 cubes.
It would be very slow going and the walls would be very thick.
A good arrengenent would be ,Three rows of three. Or 3*3=9 cubic units.
Zero would be enough.
The sequence appears to be alternating between cubes of integers and their negative counterparts. The first number is -4 cubed, the second is 5 cubed, the third is -6 cubed, the fourth is 7 cubed, and the fifth is -8 cubed. Therefore, the next number in the sequence would be 8 cubed, which is 512.
12