There is no suitable calculation at all on the list you posted with the question.
I use continue and perform in this sentence by using them as a quotation, in the same way they were used in the question, which is also a sentence. I could have written, "continue" and "perform" just as well. As I continue to perform this exercise of answering the question, I wonder if I will. I continue to wonder if it will perform any purpose. Also, if the word "continue" appears at the bottom of a form only, then there should be one "continue" per form.
It could be metres per second (radio waves), or centimetres per second (microwaves), down to nanometres per second (gamma rays).
Feet per second is a unit of velocity, but not necessarily the same thing. Velocity could be in meters per hour or feet per second could be a measure of speed, which does not take direction into account, as velocity does.
It could be as little as just over zero (from a fraction of a second before noon to a fraction of a second after) to as much as 12 hours (from a fraction of a second after midnight to a fraction of a second after noon).
Rhea Vargas
multiply divide and count Each of ENIAC's 20 accumulators could do 5000 additions or subtractions per second. A special panel called the "multiplier" could control 4 accumulators to do multiplication by repeated addition and shifting. A special panel called the "divider/square rooter" could control 5 accumulators to do division by repeated subtraction and shifting or square roots using a modification of the division process. A special panel called the "master programmer" could be programmed to sequence the machine through arbitrary functions or iterative processes.
cost 100 million 100 trillion
They could only perform basic calculations.
Each accumulator could do 5000 additions/subtractions per second and there were 20 accumulators that could operate simultaneously.
ENIAC had neon lamps and oscilloscopes to show current machine state, but these were usually only used for test & debug purposes. The only real output device on ENIAC was one electromechanical IBM cardpunch that could punch 100 cards per minute, 8 ten digit numbers per card maximum.
No, ENIAC could store only 20 numbers of 10 digits length. All other numbers were constants set on switches by hand. It takes thousands of numbers per second of sound and millions of numbers per second of a movie.
ENIAC (Electronic Numerical Integrator And Computer)It was the first digital computer developed at University of Pennsylvania in the 1940s by John Mauchly and J. Presper Eckert. It was designed for the Army for advanced calculations at high speeds and to allow charting of ballistic trajectories for artillery ammunition. By the time it was invented WWII was over and was instead used for calculations for the atomic bomb, and other calculations for advancing war technology.
5,000 calculations per second is glacially slow for a supercomputer. I do not believe anyone ever built a supercomputer that was that slow. The first viable supercomputer was the Cray-1, built in 1976. The Cray-1 was able to perform about 136 Mega-FLOPS (136,000). Today's supercomputers perform more than 5 Trillion (5,000,000,000,000) floating point operations per second (FLOPS).The first computer deliberately designed to be "significantly faster" than the fastest computer of the time, the IBM NORC is occasionally called the "first supercomputer" (although it doesn't meet all the requirements usually set for qualification) could perform 66,667 additions or subtractions per second (but this was a unique one of a kind computer). This is more than 13 times faster than the speed you are asking about.Even the first computer generally identified as a "supercomputer" the UNIVAC LARC could perform 250,000 additions or subtractions per second (however it was far from viable as only two of these machines were built, UNIVAC spent more building them than they were payed, and it was already completely obsolete the day the first one was finished). This is 50 times faster than the speed you are asking about.All later supercomputers (viable or not) were faster than the LARC.You might be thinking of ENIAC, which did 5000 additions or subtractions per second per accumulator but had 20 accumulators and sometimes operated 2 or more accumulators at the same time. But NOBODY ever considered ENIAC a supercomputer.
Mechanical calculators could perform basic arithmetic functions such as addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division. They could also perform more complex calculations such as square roots and logarithms depending on the model and design. Mechanical calculators were used before electronic calculators became prevalent.
There is insufficient information in the question to properly answer it. You need to specify which FPGA you are interested in. Please restate the question.
You could use other computer applications to do some calculations or use a calculator or do them on paper.You could use other computer applications to do some calculations or use a calculator or do them on paper.You could use other computer applications to do some calculations or use a calculator or do them on paper.You could use other computer applications to do some calculations or use a calculator or do them on paper.You could use other computer applications to do some calculations or use a calculator or do them on paper.You could use other computer applications to do some calculations or use a calculator or do them on paper.You could use other computer applications to do some calculations or use a calculator or do them on paper.You could use other computer applications to do some calculations or use a calculator or do them on paper.You could use other computer applications to do some calculations or use a calculator or do them on paper.You could use other computer applications to do some calculations or use a calculator or do them on paper.You could use other computer applications to do some calculations or use a calculator or do them on paper.