The fundamental concept is that there are many processes in the world that contain a random element. If that were not the case, everything would be deterministic and there would be no need for probability of statistics.
It would depend on the parents' genes and age. Globally, the probability is approx 0.483
The answer to this is 1 minus the probability that they will have 3 or fewer children. This would happen only if they had a boy as the first, second or third child. The probability they have a boy as first child is 0.5 The probability they have a boy as second is 0.25 The probability they have a boy as third is 0.125 Thus the total probability is 0.875 And so the probability they will have more than three children is 1-0.875 or 0.125
If the gender of a child were an independent variable then the genders of the existing children would be irrelevant and so the probability of the next child being a girl would be approximately 1/2.It would be approximately 1/2 because the overall proportion is not exactly half. However, and more important, is the fact that the gender of a child is affected by the parents' genes and so is not independent of the gender of previous children.
No, you could not be sure. There would be a high probability that you would roll ten but with a random event, you can never be sure of a specific outcome such as that.
The fundamental concept is that there are many processes in the world that contain a random element. If that were not the case, everything would be deterministic and there would be no need for probability of statistics.
Probability concerns with estimating a likelyhood for an event to either yet to happen or would have happened.
It would depend on the parents' genes and age. Globally, the probability is approx 0.483
Cognitive psychologists and neuroscientists are best suited to explain the concept of mental set. These experts study how our minds process information and solve problems, including how mental sets can influence our thinking and decision-making.
The answer to this is 1 minus the probability that they will have 3 or fewer children. This would happen only if they had a boy as the first, second or third child. The probability they have a boy as first child is 0.5 The probability they have a boy as second is 0.25 The probability they have a boy as third is 0.125 Thus the total probability is 0.875 And so the probability they will have more than three children is 1-0.875 or 0.125
If they are expressing the trait, 100%, as their genotypes would be, rr X rr If they both carry the trait and it is dominated, Rr X Rr, then the probability would be, 25% of their child expressing the trait.
Can some one answer please Can some one answer please
The probability that a child is affected with galactosemia is 1/40,000. The probability that both children are affected would be (1/40,000) * (1/40,000) = 1/1,600,000,000.
That you are manipulating the child into believing this and that it would be harmful to the child to learn otherwise. see links
say its too many to count
Eye color is actually not controlled by straight Mendellian genetics. However, based on your question, the probability of a brown eyed child would be 50% and the probability of a blue eyed child would be 50%.
If the gender of a child were an independent variable then the genders of the existing children would be irrelevant and so the probability of the next child being a girl would be approximately 1/2.It would be approximately 1/2 because the overall proportion is not exactly half. However, and more important, is the fact that the gender of a child is affected by the parents' genes and so is not independent of the gender of previous children.